Shire of York

Shire of York

Wednesday 7 January 2015

A former shire president of the Wheatbelt town of York says a "clean-out" of all council positions is needed to restore community confidence.
On Tuesday, York Shire council was suspended for six months following a State Government probe into ongoing complaints about its ability to provide good governance.
A commissioner, business consultant and former South Perth Mayor James Best, was also appointed to oversee the shire while councillors and staff undergo training.
Tony Boyle resigned in December after serving on York council for nine years, and as shire president for two of those.
Mr Boyle said he could no longer see a way forward for the council.
"They were dysfunctional in that there was no trust and accusations were flying left, right and centre," he said.
"It got to the point where a certain group of residents in the town were making it almost impossible to govern, with continual harassment to council and staff - particularly senior staff."
Mr Boyle has welcomed the suspension but said it may take an entirely new council to regain community confidence that has been lost over the last 12 months.
"I would prefer to see a new team but then again I wonder who would stand after seeing what's been happening," he said.
Mr Boyle has concerns the suspension has tarnished the shire's reputation and said the council should be suspended until October, when Local Government elections are held.
"I think a clean-out of all positions and then I really think this will pave the way for amalgamation," he said.
"But then again it poses the question; who would want to amalgamate with a council that's in the hands of a commissioner?"
Today, Local Government Minister Tony Simpson acknowledged that there were tensions between council and the York community.
"There are some issues to do with the wider community but I think the important part here is trying to deliver good governance for the people of York," he said.

Minister acknowledges tensions between council and community

In November, Local Government Minister Tony Simpson wrote to the council giving it 21 days to respond to concerns regarding staff conduct and procedures.
The decision to suspend the Wheatbelt council followed a two-month investigation into the shire's activities by the Department of Local Government and Communities.
In the department's report, it was alleged the shire had failed to maintain a proper documented record of its decision making processes, failed to deal with a code of conduct complaint in a professional manner and failed to control public question time at council meetings.
A number of allegations were directed at Shire President Matthew Reid, who has systematically denied the accusations labelling them as "baseless".
"There is no basis for those allegations and that's part of the evidence that we've provided but the Minister has chosen not to discuss that with council," he said.
"It's quite clear the statements that they're making...that we've refuted with hard evidence, as in tape recordings, to show that they're not accurate."
The department alleged there were ongoing conflicts between Mr Reid, the former acting chief executive Michael Keeble and other staff, which compromised their ability to make good decisions.
Mr Reid said the evidence the Minister and his department used to compile the show cause notice, which was issued to the shire to alert them of an intention to suspend it, was not accurate.
"There are some very significant flaws in the documentation that he used to draw up the show cause notice from and I'm very concerned that nothing is being done to rectify that situation," he said.
A spokesman for Tony Simpson said the Minister would not comment further on the matter.
Mr Reid said council still had the backing of the community.
"I think there is actually a lot of confidence in the council," he said.
"There were between two and three hundred people who came to the last town meeting to vote their support for council."

53 comments:

  1. Tony says...he "has concerns the suspension has tarnished the shire's reputation and said the council should be suspended until October, when Local Government elections are held". Has Tony forgotten, he made a pretty good job of "tarnishing the Shires reputation" when he was publicly censured...?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hang on a minute Tony, do you have short term memory loss or something. It is on record that you voted to appoint Matthew Reid as your leader.
      Are you actually admitting you made a mistake?

      Delete
  2. Tony Boyle has selective memory.

    The info below was when Tony was the Shire President.

    “Mr Castrilli said there had been indications from within the local
    government sector of disconnect between some elected members and
    their community and I have taken steps to address those concerns through
    legislation”.

    The comment from Castrillii indicated under Tony Boyle's leadership some of his fellow councillors were disconnected from the community.
    Tony, you didn't tarnish York - you destroyed it!

    As Shire President you were also before the Standards Panel for breaches of conduct - so I think you are the pot calling the kettle black Tony.



    ReplyDelete
  3. funny how the councillors keep blaming the few so called trouble makers for their own bad behaviour. and what is he doing commenting on stuff he is no longer a councillor and can now be sued for comments made as a lay person .

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have saved "TB clown" to my desktop to a position of honour, so I can admire him every day till the thrill wears off. Thank you for this blessed [bless-ed] offering/opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. After you and Duperouzel resigned Tony, Community confidence was doing just fine.

    You had trouble accepting Matthew Reid was doing a good job and toddled off to see Minister Simpson to white ant the very man you voted in as your leader.

    You are responsible for the tarnishing!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tony's opinion is irrelevant.
    I love the outfit - suits him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What a lovely smile he has, and what good teeth! All the better to charm. All the better to bite. And the wig: must deliver justice very colourfully. Is that a hard-boiled egg he had for breakfast? Lovely jelly beans on his bowtie. Bit of garden on his shirt. All up a delightful artful dodger (oops: codger).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woolly-headed (wigged) justice of variable colouring? Or is that a woolly Crown rather than Whig? (For the infomation of any newcomers to York, Tony is sheep-farming royalty.)

      Couple definitions of Whig:
      dictionary.search.yahoo.com
      n. noun
      A member of an 18th- and 19th-century British political party that was opposed to the Tories.
      ......
      A 19th-century American political party formed to oppose the Democratic Party and favoring high tariffs and a loose interpretation of the Constitution.

      There is an interesting conflict of interest represented in the following quote from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/641802/Whig-and-Tory
      viz: "Under Queen Anne, the Tories represented the resistance, mainly by the country gentry, to religious toleration and foreign entanglements. Toryism became identified with Anglicanism and the squirearchy and Whiggism with the aristocratic, landowning families and the financial interests of the wealthy middle classes." Maybe Tony isn't sure which he is?

      The article goes on:
      "The reign of George III ... brought a shift of meanings to the two words. No Whig Party as such existed at the time, only a series of aristocratic groups and family connections operating in Parliament through patronage and influence. Nor was there a Tory Party, only Tory sentiment, tradition, and temperament surviving among certain families and social groups. The so-(called King’s Friends, from whom George III preferred to draw his ministers ......came from both traditions and from neither....

      After 1784 ...Pitt the Younger emerged as the leader of a new Tory Party, which broadly represented the interests of the country gentry, the merchant classes, and official administerial groups. In opposition, a revived Whig Party, led by .... Fox, came to represent the interests of religious dissenters, industrialists, and others who sought electoral, parliamentary, and philanthropic reforms.

      ..[during] the wars against France...A large section of the more moderate Whigs deserted Fox and supported Pitt. After 1815 and a period of party confusion, [came] the party labels of Conservative and Liberal assumed by each faction, respectively. Although the label Tory has continued to be used to designate the Conservative Party, Whig has ceased to have much political meaning."

      Surely some useful or useless analogies can be taken from HISTORY.

      Delete
    2. Yes Tony has the right to voice his opinion. However, very few are interested in it now.

      Delete
    3. 'Whig' is derived from 'whiggamore', a Scots word meaning something like 'drover'. 'Tory' comes from an Irish word meaning 'brigand' or 'thief'. Surely nobody would want to suggest that either description can properly be applied to any individual involved in the York Shire Council saga?

      Delete
    4. Onya, James. Dictionaries are indeed enlightning. I think this clarifies the point most succinctly. Well, certain allusions of the item of 16:23, at least. How drovers and thieves became politicians blows the mind, but I guess we now have proof it is possible. By the way, according to History, Boyles were 'royalty' in certain parts of Ireland in particular.

      https://www.houseofnames.com/boyles-coat-of-arms
      "Spelling variations of this family name include: Boyle, O'Boyle, Boghill, ..Boile...Baole .....
      First found in Donegal, where they were descended from Kin Maoldun Baoghal (meaning "peril") ..." Enough said.

      Delete
    5. Of course, there's nothing wrong with being a drover. The original reference must have been to a particularly undesirable group of drovers somewhere north of Hadrian's Wall.

      Fascinating stuff about the origins of the Boyle family and evolution of the name. To be facetious for a moment, I think 'King Boghill of York' has a fine ring to it, a very fine ring indeed.

      Delete
    6. Got a great laugh out of your selection "King Boghill of York", James.

      But please do be careful what you say about drovers somewhere north of Hadrian's Wall.... (I hae me reasons). Don't you dare cast aspersions on my 'reiver' ancestors :-)
      Hadrian's Wall is still within England, but since the distance to Scotland was/is less than 1km, then I guess this description is fair enough. A certain Scottish (originally Norman) clan of reivers had apparently in the olden days the motto "never not theives". There motto has in modern times become "never not ready" — and its not the Doyles.

      Delete
    7. You will recognise, James, the difference: 'nunquam non pirates' became 'nunquam non paratus".

      Delete
    8. Nunquam non paratus (never unprepared) = semper paratus (always prepared). Are you of the reiver clan Johnstone, by any chance?

      My paternal family motto is Norman French 'Prest d'accomplir', which I like to translate as 'ready to do the job'. You can see that 'prest', ready, is derived from Latin 'paratus'. In today's French it is 'pret' with a circumflex over the 'e'.

      There is a Scottish as well as an Irish clan Boyle. The Scottish Boyles get their name from Beauville in Normandy. If Mr Tony Boyle is descended from the Irish Boyles, his family motto is Dominus providebit, 'the Lord will provide', and he may well be of royal descent - as very many of us are. He may in that case be related to Robert Boyle, the great 17th century scientist who first propounded the law named after him, that the pressure of a gas tends to decrease as its volume increases, and vice versa.

      Delete
    9. As per Anonymous 8 January 2015 at 01:29: I had read about "the Lord will provide" possibility. It right now occurs to me that there may be a connection between that and the article re "There are 6 things that the Lord hates". (!?!?). Yes, and the de Beauvilles in Scotland from Normandy.

      Interesting about the similar "nunquam non paratus" and "prest d'accomplir" mottoes. "Great minds" and all that.... I had never stopped to think of the philological evolution of "paratus" to "prest" before. 100% common sense when one considers the cognate vocabulary.

      Curious analogies could be made regarding Boyle's law that states, as you pointed out, "that the pressure of a gas tends to decrease as its volume increases, and vice versa." N'est-ce pas?

      If you contact me via the address provided by another respondent I will comment on a related matter.

      Delete
  8. Tony Boyle is a genuine person with the best interests of the community and certainly has the right to voice his opinion. Not everyone attended the meetings in support of Mr Reid. No wonder so many people elect to be anonymous on this blog with people talking class actions and suing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wild Bill itchcock7 January 2015 at 16:55

      Dear Anonymous
      Don't forget that Tony the clown stated that, "when he was elected Shire President, the first thing he and his deputy were going to do, was to get rid of the TWO Hooper's". How many people did he say this to?

      Delete
    2. Tony Boyle also told me, the first thing he would do would be to get rid of the two Hoopers.
      Wonder how Pat Hooper feels, knowing he was siding with the very person who was stabbing him behind his back?
      In my book Tony Boyle will always be a lier.

      Delete
    3. I do actually think Tony Boyle is in essence a good man. The problem started when he followed his personal guide's advice to stand for Shire when his genuine aptitudes lay elsewhere. He is a pleasant man to talk to one-to-one; but bureaucratic niceties were not his forte, let alone leading others in a bureaucracy. He bit off more than he could chew. That is rather sad.

      Delete
    4. Hardly anybody attending those meetings displayed opposition to Cr Reid or support for Cr Boyle. I'm afraid that people who don't attend don't count either way, just like people who don't vote.

      If Mr Boyle had the best interests of our community at heart, he wouldn't have run off whinging to the Minister when he couldn't control the actions of the new council.

      In his resignation letter, Mr Boyle complained of a lack of leadership on the council. I'd like to know what 'leadership' means to him. My guess is that he has an unfashionably authoritarian idea of leadership, i.e. that it entails telling people what to do, getting angry when disobeyed or questioned, calling people names when they disagree with him (remember the Saints?), moving mountains for people who fawn on him and scorning the interests of those who don't.

      Perhaps he forgot that councils and council staff exist to serve the ratepayers and other residents, not the other way around.

      A good leader is a guide, not a dictator. Good leaders give priority to the desires and aspirations of the people they represent, not to their own.

      Cr Reid impressed me as the second kind of leader. He made it clear from the start that he believed in open, honest, accountable local government. He had a practical vision for the future of York, a town he obviously loves. Without the petulant, obstructionist antics of Mr Boyle and others, he would have been able to deliver on his promises. Cr Reid, stay in office, the folk who really matter have faith in you, when this ridiculous and unwarranted suspension is over your chance will come again.

      Mr Boyle and his friends have done their best to discredit Matthew Reid. Instead, they have succeeded only in discrediting themselves. So, by foolishly and deceitfully taking direction from the Boyle and Hooper faction, have the Minister and staff of the DLGC.

      Delete
    5. Well said James.
      Yes Cr. Reid please stay in office. York needs you and the people need you.
      We will continue to stand beside you.

      Delete
    6. Yes, Anonymous at 20:02, I too believe that Mr Boyle is 'in essence a good man', but good people sometimes do questionable things and when they do, as we all do, they like the rest of us have to face the consequences. He will have plenty of opportunity from now on (God help me, I nearly said 'going forward', wash your mouth out James) to do good things and recover his currently rather tattered reputation.

      I'm perplexed by your reference to 'his personal guide'. Do you mean a spirit guide? Is it a druid or red indian? Are you saying that he is using a medium or planchette to contact the dark powers? I certainly hope not!

      Delete
    7. James Plumridge's second last paragraph at 20:27 characterising Cr Reid's leadership rings true for me — totally.

      Delete
    8. James, re the 'guide': somewhat less ethereal and closer to [these parts] than the type of 'guide' referred to in yours at 01:09.

      Delete
  9. Tony is absolutely delusional. He clearly lives in a big foggy bubble. Perhaps it's just a case of telling so many porkies he just can't remember the truth anymore. As a pillar of our community he should be above all the cloak and daggers and white anting type behaviour but he instead is one of the driving forces. His actions have been despicable. Ditto Pat Hooper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it's one of the residual (foggy) bubbles from the car wash incident. Tony popped his car thru a car wash and forgot to close the sun roof on his Merc. This was on the way to a posh wedding. Sally got a drenching had to go home and change.

      Delete
  10. Rot starts at the top...That rot started nine years ago with the appointment of Ray Hooper as CEO. As time went on, the rot permeated the layers beneath it. I resigned as an employee of the SOY due to the CEO, his tyrannical and unethical behaviour was unacceptable by my moral compass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CONGRATULATIONS 21:16 and thank you!
      What a brave person. It takes a lot of guts to do what you did.
      I have always said people have choices in life, they either cross the line or they resign.
      By resigning I hope you realise you have joined the so called 'minority' referred to as 'the trouble makers' .
      I say a very warm welcome to you.

      Delete
    2. I hope more ex (or current) staff have the courage to break the code of silence.
      One has already been brave - lets see some more come forward.

      Delete
  11. Offering people unequivocal support over a coffee and then doing everything in his power to ensure the request was voted down behind the scenes makes him a liar not a man who simply lacks bureaucratic niceties. He was very nice one on one to the people he lied to as well. Pat Hooper was one of them

    ReplyDelete
  12. Public Question time October 2014

    Mrs Sally Boyle

    Question 2:
    What community work has been put off because of the $99,000 being spent on FOI expenses?

    Response:
    This has inevitably negatively impacted on the delivery of Shire services.

    Truthful responses:
    1). Sorry, $99,000 is a ridiculous calculation based on staff time not actual cost which is how we usually explain finances to you.
    2). A majority of the $99,000 was payment for costs associated with having to refer most applications (that had not been dealt with correctly in house) to the FOI Commissioner for external review.
    3). Don't panic, we can always find plenty of money for essential services such and conferences and members' refreshments.
    4). Phew....glad you asked the question, we need to show concern for the costs involved in an attempt to embarrass the applicants and detract from what might be uncovered as a result!
    5) Lets me just clarify that with you, you do mean FOI expenses in the context of the legal expenses associated with 'F*****g Off Investigations'?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. However the cost was calculated, and whatever the actual amount, none of it would have been incurred if the then shire council and administration had not forced ratepayers to get via the FOI process information that should have been available with good grace directly through the CEO.

      There was never an excuse for the level of secrecy maintained by former administrations, unless you consider having something to hide an excuse.

      What Mrs Boyle should have asked is this: Why is the Shire incurring these huge FOI costs which could easily be avoided simply by giving concerned ratepayers the information they ask for?



      Delete
  13. So....It's not about the money, money, money!

    Without prejudice.

    PART 1.

    On 3 January 2015, James wrote: (I apologise for the 'allegedly', which is an insult to the complainants. It's my cowardly way of avoiding a writ, though to be honest I haven't seen much to indicate that the Gang of Four are keen to defend their rather bedraggled reputations in the Supreme Court.)

    It is probable that they (the Gang of Four, together with other ex Councillors who are under the misapprehension that they are no longer culpable) would not have a case to answer. They have acted 'inappropriately' (in the sense of; in bad faith). Moreover, it would involve a commitment by them to put their hands in their own pockets.

    What exactly is the depth of involvement the DLG have/had in the sordid history of York and how much monitoring and delving has been done? It is so easy, even for someone new to the process, to research and find factual information on the Shire's own website in the Minutes of Council and Committee meetings. How could this have been overlooked for so long?

    It is well known, when Cr Boyle was threatened with a defamation suit, he (ab)used the Shire purse to obtain legal advice from the Shire lawyers to defend himself. The defamation issue came about whilst he was Shire President and as a result of his conduct at council meetings. (This behaviour resulted in a finding of three breaches of legislation and public censure by the Local Government Standards Panel). What is worse, other Councillors supported his claim for the expenditure, condoning his conduct. As a result of their approval and his poor behaviour, on that particular occasion it cost the ratepayers $5,000 to cover the insurance excess. A public censure is proof in itself that Cr Boyle acted in bad faith. Did Cr Boyle ever voluntarily repay that $5,000? Have Council checked their own policy and asked for re-imbursement of the claim for legal representation as the claim would have been, in no doubt, invalid?

    On another occasion at a Council Meeting, Cr Boyle & Cr Hooper requested support for funding of $1000 to obtain legal advice, again relating to 'personal' issues, fortunately the request was denied by a majority of a 'different' Council.

    At the Special Electors Meeting in December 2014, the Shire President informed the public that three files containing factual information and documents were being submitted to the Minister as part of the rebuttal to the Show Cause Notice and copies would also be available for public viewing at the Shire office. Go and have a look, there are many interesting and surprising documents contained within. It will make you understand why we are where we are today and why it all stinks of a cover up!

    Plenty of documents record 'alleged' excessive costs for unapproved or unwarranted expenditure to include some of the following:
    It is 'alleged' that CEO Ray Hooper made claims for goods and services to which he was not entitled. That excessive claims were made for Conference expenses 'outside of confirmed conference dates'. CEO Ray Hooper and his wife certainly appear to have enjoyed our hospitality to the tune of thousands of dollars!

    There are many examples provided over a period of years which also show (and again, it is 'alleged'), that Cr Boyle was rather frivolous with the contents of the mini bar on his exit from one hotel, walking away with alcohol and snacks brimming from his pockets (and probably emitting a knowing guffaw at the thought of it being ratepayers footing the bill). The final bill also included full payment for entertaining Mrs Boyle! It could be the case that Cr Boyle made re-imbursement for his wife's costs and all goods and services not relating to 'Council Business'.??? Is there a Policy???

    ReplyDelete
  14. So....It's not about the money, money, money!

    Without prejudice.

    Part 2

    Then there is the copy of the 2014 Shire Auditor's report into the use of the Corporate Credit Card by the past CEO Ray Hooper. With so many payments listed for weekday dining out in various eating houses in York and even the Gull Servo, it is likely that very few evening meals needed cooking! There are numerous recordings of 'staff training lunches', 'budget discussion lunches' and 'financial accounting lunch meetings' , we should really have had the most qualified 'Senior staff' in Local Government and the foundations of a perfect budget and balance sheet.

    What about the governance training which is now being demanded from the Councillors whilst under suspension?

    How did that work in the past?

    Then it occurred to me, the Council did have 'group training sessions', not using the Shire offices and facilities at minimal expense as would be expected but by having a 'few days away' bonding and team building in Cervantes and the likes at a cost of $1000's. Not forgetting a quick stop of at a local Hotel en route to pick up some 'grog' for the evening entertainment and clock up some more $ on the Credit Card. Once there, a jaunt to the local restaurant where most might have meagre fish and chips others might go for a dozen and a half oysters washed down with a couple of $18 glasses of Port and perhaps lashings of alcoholic ginger beer!

    Then there is Local Government Week: open for attendance by all elected members and held in Perth over 3 days. This is an annual event, an acceptable and expected event for Councillors to attend. Registration costs of $6873.00 aside, allowing for a couple of nights accommodation and meals it would be accepted that reasonable costs would work out at approximately $850 on a per room basis (with or without partners in attendance). In August 2013, five council representatives attended so it could be calculated that these costs would be approximately $4250.00.

    However for York Council, it cost the ratepayers $7267.00 for the Rydges Hotel and other hospitality in Perth. Of those attending, Councillor's Duperouzel. Smythe and Scott clocked up a paltry $861.50, $825.00 and $1000.00 respectively. Then we have Shire President Boyle with a mere $1,744.50 (including the mini bar) and CEO Ray Hooper with a stupendous $2,763.00.
    How? Probably because a majority of the additional cost related to supplementary overnight hotel and hospitality costs - poor things, it must have been so draining and such a long drive that CEO Hooper and Cr Boyle felt the need to stay at the Hotel the night before and the night after with sustenance, and all at our expense!

    These would have been some of Cr Boyle's final conference attendances as Shire President so.... his apt philosophy was perhaps,

    "Might as well be hung for a sheep as for a lamb"

    Isn't it a lucky thing that the Municipal fund received a healthy boost from our rates increase to a base of 16% this year to bolster up the unbudgeted items and overspending from previous years.

    Ex Cr Boyle. while in your role as Shire President, it is still hard to believe that during a public meeting you announced that you had studied the bible for 40 years and yet you appear to have learnt nothing from it.

    'Pride comes before a fall'

    I will translate this proverb for you (for the purpose of clarity only and not the intention of being condescending).

    'If you're too conceited or self-important, something will happen to make you look foolish'.

    When you were touting for your place as Shire President back in 2011, you told me a story that, as a boy, your father had taken your marbles away from you for stealing and lying and he gave them to your brother. I believe you have lost your marbles...for good.

    Hold you head in shame at your audacity!



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jude E de J.....'lle9 January 2015 at 02:47

      Following So....It's not about the money, money, money!
      Without prejudice.

      Wow! (1) "Might as well be hung for a sheep as for a lamb" and (2) the Parable of the marbles.

      On (2) as a child Tony must have been deeply scarred by this event, and it could account for a lot. I jest not.

      (3) However, since not this item but the one presented earlier than this on the site (about the Lord and the 6, nay 7 things he abhors) is a Biblical quote of somewhat ominous nature, we could move to Matthew's Gospel ch. 25 and the tale of the Separation of the Sheep from the Goats (verses 31-46). It is not a message in which I wish to single out Tony per se, but does make comparisons parallel to how we could compare a Shire or any other Agency which oppresses the people and one which would have compassion on the people. It would be lovely to have Shire (Council and Officers) who would make compassion an underlying Ethic by which to moderate the way they implement the Policies and negotiate with the Citizens. They could be commended.

      (4) The preceding Parable in Matthew 25:14-30 is about the brothers whose father dealt out to his servants talents (Greek units of money): 5 to one, 2 to another, and 1 to the third. The first 2 servants made a profit for their Master, but the third just hid his talent away. The Parable ends with that one talent being taken from this servant and given to the servant who doubled his master's money to make 10 talents. There is an even more unpleasant ending to this story; but since Veritas's Part 1 and Part 2 above on Jan 8th at 8:34-36 deals with wasted money, perhaps this Parable and its predictions and outcomes are relevant.

      Delete
    2. We should ask Pope Francis to give our councillors training in humility. This could be followed by lessons on compassion from the Dalai Lama.

      Delete
    3. Jude, I appreciate that you may have a good knowledge of the Bible but I don't think it totally relevant in response to the information provided just because there is reference to the Bible in the closing paragraphs.

      The information provided by Veritas is far more expansive that that, it is current serious behaviour. No biblical excuse or psychological analysis can excuse or justify the actions of some.

      Delete
    4. Miss Behaviour, I tend to agree - the information provided was the focus point of the comment.
      I have found the previous 'brief' Biblical references, Latin quotes, poetry, verse and quips throughout the blog very amusing but some recent comments are getting a bit too deep and meaningful even for me and I wouldn't say that I am particularly 'uneducated'.
      I haven't got enough time to read the blog and Google everything to translate at the same time.
      I am pleased to see that there are less 'one liners' with no context whatsoever but at the same time would like to read a few less psychology essays unless they relate specifically to topic (and I understand the content)!. Would like to see it get back on track, probably just me or maybe others feel the same too?. Can we get a bit of grounding here and maybe even a bit more humour again?
      Absolutely no offence intended towards the author(s) I think you are extremely intelligent but, to the point of making us normal folk go dizzy and stop posting!

      Delete
    5. Dear Percy, sorry if you misunderstood my post. I did not intend to appear to shoot Jude down in flames. My comments referred to emphasis on the content of the post from Veritas and not to criticize the content of Jude's own posts (which incidentally I enjoy). I apologise to you both.

      Delete
    6. Jude E de J.....'lle9 January 2015 at 23:59

      Miss Behaviour and Percy Cuted: No biblical excuse was intended. Far from it. Wasn't seeing the culprits as sheep, but can see where the confusion may have come in. Too obscurely handled? Probably. I won't say "mea culpa", as that is Latin.

      Yes, of course the main content was and is important. I just saw a link with the previous biblical quote blog item and worked on that connection. As I agree, obscurely.

      Yes, by yesterday the rapid escalation of blog material and responses was getting somewhat brain-addling (and this 'ere comment was not intended as a psychological analysis).

      Am quickly de-tangling my brain as requested. Can't absolutely guarantee no relapse ever, but trying :-)

      Delete
    7. Jude E de J.....'lle10 January 2015 at 01:29

      No 'fences, Miss Behaviour; and I see Percy also didn't intend any 'fence (just said what he felt, and in the interest of 'free speech'. But sorry Percy about this almost one-liner :-) Still not completely reformed, me.

      Delete
    8. Jude E de J.....'lle10 January 2015 at 16:57

      By the way, sleeping on it a bit longer, it really WAS the expenditure excesses and extreme failure in 'stewardship of money' provided by the ratepayers for the essential running of the town and wellbeing of the ratepayers that I was referring to in the latter part my too obscure comment of 9 January 2015 at 02:47. The matters biblical were just by way of analogy, in the context of previous biblical quotes — certain relevant phrases coming to mind, rather than 'showing off' for its own sake. (I don't think I have ever been known to 'show off'. Rather quiet and reserved, me.)

      Delete
    9. Keep it relevant to the task at hand which is getting justice. Some of us are time poor.

      Delete
  15. James, I think the previous councillors would have definitely benefited from lessons in humility and compassion.

    Very sad for anyone to go through life without these attributes.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ooh la la! Je ne comprends pas... adepto referta and all that....
    To break up the deep and meaningful 's briefly to please Percy, a whimsical play on lyrics - just for a bit of fun through adversity
    No Biblical association ..unless you count Joseph as a Carpenter....!

    Such a feelin's comin' over me
    There is truth in almost ev'ry thing I see
    No McLeod's, no more lies, got some tears in my eyes
    And I won't be surprised if it's a dream

    Everything I wanted York to see
    Is now comin' true especially for me
    And the reason is clear, it's because the blog is here
    It's the nearest thing to truth that I have seen

    I'm on the blog ev'ry day lookin' down at your creation
    And the only explanation I can find
    Is the fun that I've found ever since you've been around
    Your blogs' put me at the top of the world!

    ReplyDelete
  17. All of us, Jo the Carpenter included it seems, are glad the blog is here. Wonder what the next revelation will be. Truth combined with humour is a pretty good mix, I reckon. And better still when it means as much as you tell us it does to you, oh Veritas. Up with the blog! Onya, Veritas, Jo and friends (including me, truth being told).

    ReplyDelete
  18. The last time the Shire of York Code of Conduct was reviewed and adopted was the 17 September 2012. Tony Boyle was Shire President at the time, it was at that same meeting Tony Boyle contravened three Code of Conduct regulations, what a dickhead!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tony Boyle never understood he was supposed to abide by DLG rules or regulations.

    To this day Tony is still strutting up and down the CBD claiming he has done nothing wrong. He even goes so far as to say he is proud of his achievements. There has to be a clinical term (other than dickhead) for people who do really bad things to others and still believe they have done nothing wrong.

    Tony also says he got out just at the right time - so who tipped him off I wonder?

    ReplyDelete
  20. He's a more clinical term for Tony Boyle Dew Process -SCAMP.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sorry Bill, Tony Boyle is far more dishonourable than any scamp I've known.

    Tony could have stopped things well before they got out of hand but he chose not to, now he has to live with the fact he was part of the York wrecking team.

    Many in York have lost respect for him, including me.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The clown suit is appropriate for Boyle - as a Councillor.

    Reckon he should have stayed out in the paddock with the sheep and wheat.

    ReplyDelete