Date February 23, 2015
Mr. David Templeman MLA
Shadow Minister for Local Government & Communities
Electorate Office
4 Sutton Street
MANDURAH, WA 6201
(08) 9581 3944
david.templeman@wa.gov.au
Your Ref: RURAL COUNCIL-FORCED AMALGAMATION
It is gratifying to see that at least one member of the Western Australian Parliament may be listening
to the voice of the ratepayer. A potentially very powerful voice I might add.
The Department of Local Government & Communities is currently an authoritarian, disingenuous, dangerous ambiguity. Its attitudes, concepts, evaluations and decisions regarding what is acceptable to any and all Local Government Areas does not consider, accept or reflect the will of the people. It reflects the wants of a particular Premier and some of his Government, not the needs of hundreds- of- thousands of West Australian local council electors.
You may have been contacted by just a small number of constituents with grievances regarding this matter, but let me assure you that there have been over 62,000 hits on the ShireofYork6302 Blog site with all comments patently critical of the Minister and his Department.
With due respect, The Department and its Minister made its pre-emptive decision regarding the Shire’s response to its Show Cause Notice by arbitrarily suspending York Council on January 6, 2015. That process was marred by political interference, disparaging comments, abuse of authority and the use of deliberately misleading information, bordering on malicious falsehood, by the Minister and his Department.
So please do not think you will be in breach of any parliamentary protocol, or anything like a democratic due process if you raise this imbroglio in Parliament now! Premier Colin Barnett will probably thank you for placing the’ Question Time’ spotlight on the WA Corruption and Crime Commission and its alleged war against local government corruption.
I am sure that there are many who will wish that you now hold the Minister to account regarding his continuing treatment of the Shire of York and Councillor Reid. You are the Shadow Minister for Local Government & Communities- so it is actually your day job.
There have been those who have contacted their Local Member, Ms. Mia Davies. It would appear she considers York to be a Leper Colony.
I am sure that there are numerous members of the Labor Party with a legal background, including Mr. John Quigley, the Shadow Attorney General, who have major concerns regarding the current fiduciary compliance regime within the Local Government sector. (Premier Barnett appears to.) Therefore I would suggest that you obtain their opinions on what constitutes ‘Misappropriation of Funds’ with particular reference to the use of municipal funds by public servants.
Misappropriation, in this context, should mean the intentional illegal, improper, wrongful, unwarranted and inappropriate use of municipal property or funds by a public official, either for personal benefit or for any unauthorized purpose. It should also be considered to be when the public official is in breach of a canonical ‘Fiduciary Duty of Care’.
‘Misappropriation’ is- and should be considered in these circumstances- a ‘Criminal Act’.
The criminality judgement should extend to those in authority (being Elected Members of Local government Councils) who duly authorize the intentional illegal, improper, wrongful, unwarranted and inappropriate use of municipal property or funds by a public official for any reason and purpose.
It is reasonable to assume that an Elected Member of Council would or should know that there is
an applicable, canonical ‘Fiduciary Duty of Care’ attached to any authority granted to them.
Mr. David Templeman MLA
Shadow Minister for Local Government & Communities
Electorate Office
4 Sutton Street
MANDURAH, WA 6201
(08) 9581 3944
david.templeman@wa.gov.au
Your Ref: RURAL COUNCIL-FORCED AMALGAMATION
It is gratifying to see that at least one member of the Western Australian Parliament may be listening
to the voice of the ratepayer. A potentially very powerful voice I might add.
The Department of Local Government & Communities is currently an authoritarian, disingenuous, dangerous ambiguity. Its attitudes, concepts, evaluations and decisions regarding what is acceptable to any and all Local Government Areas does not consider, accept or reflect the will of the people. It reflects the wants of a particular Premier and some of his Government, not the needs of hundreds- of- thousands of West Australian local council electors.
You may have been contacted by just a small number of constituents with grievances regarding this matter, but let me assure you that there have been over 62,000 hits on the ShireofYork6302 Blog site with all comments patently critical of the Minister and his Department.
With due respect, The Department and its Minister made its pre-emptive decision regarding the Shire’s response to its Show Cause Notice by arbitrarily suspending York Council on January 6, 2015. That process was marred by political interference, disparaging comments, abuse of authority and the use of deliberately misleading information, bordering on malicious falsehood, by the Minister and his Department.
So please do not think you will be in breach of any parliamentary protocol, or anything like a democratic due process if you raise this imbroglio in Parliament now! Premier Colin Barnett will probably thank you for placing the’ Question Time’ spotlight on the WA Corruption and Crime Commission and its alleged war against local government corruption.
I am sure that there are many who will wish that you now hold the Minister to account regarding his continuing treatment of the Shire of York and Councillor Reid. You are the Shadow Minister for Local Government & Communities- so it is actually your day job.
There have been those who have contacted their Local Member, Ms. Mia Davies. It would appear she considers York to be a Leper Colony.
I am sure that there are numerous members of the Labor Party with a legal background, including Mr. John Quigley, the Shadow Attorney General, who have major concerns regarding the current fiduciary compliance regime within the Local Government sector. (Premier Barnett appears to.) Therefore I would suggest that you obtain their opinions on what constitutes ‘Misappropriation of Funds’ with particular reference to the use of municipal funds by public servants.
Misappropriation, in this context, should mean the intentional illegal, improper, wrongful, unwarranted and inappropriate use of municipal property or funds by a public official, either for personal benefit or for any unauthorized purpose. It should also be considered to be when the public official is in breach of a canonical ‘Fiduciary Duty of Care’.
‘Misappropriation’ is- and should be considered in these circumstances- a ‘Criminal Act’.
The criminality judgement should extend to those in authority (being Elected Members of Local government Councils) who duly authorize the intentional illegal, improper, wrongful, unwarranted and inappropriate use of municipal property or funds by a public official for any reason and purpose.
It is reasonable to assume that an Elected Member of Council would or should know that there is
an applicable, canonical ‘Fiduciary Duty of Care’ attached to any authority granted to them.
The Fitz Gerald Report, in the main, focuses on
the actions and activities of the former Shire of York
Chief Executive Officer Mr. Ray Hooper. It bears some striking similarities to
the Smillie Report, requested by the Shire Council of Chittering in 1999 with
regard to the actions and activities of its Chief Executive Officer Mr. Ray
Hooper.
The current Director of the Department of Local Government & Communities,
Ms. Jennifer Matthews, who has been in this position since 2008, should be well
aware of the numerous justifiable complaints raised against Mr. Ray Hooper
revealed in both the Smillie and Fitz Gerald Reports, but has chosen to ignore
them.
Between April 2008 and October 2013, Mr. Hooper, attended 38 Local Government
Conferences and Seminars throughout Australia at a minimum cost to York
ratepayers of $117,880 and was absent from the Shire of York offices for a
total of 195 days.
From February to October 2012, Mr. Hooper attended seven conferences at an
overall cost of
$25, 259.81. Representing just 1,819 ratepayers, Mr. Hooper attended the ALGA
Conference in Canberra and the LGMA Future of Local Government, in Melbourne,
for a period of 15 days at a cost of $8,652.03.The question should be raised is
what direct, or even indirect, quantifiable benefit would his attendance at
these meetings bring to the Shire of York and its ratepayers.
Statistically, in this six year period, Mr Hooper attended a conference every
two months at an average cost of $3,101.11 per excursion. In combination with
his annual leave Mr. Hooper would have spent only five years, on duty and
attendant at the Shire of York Offices out of those six years. These are
spectacularly unflattering and disturbing facts.
Documented evidence shows that Mr. Hooper attended each of these conferences
for an extremely limited time only and, on numerous occasions, the rest of his
time was spent touring with his wife. All spousal and tour expenses appear to
have been debited to, and paid for, by the Shire of York.
TWO PARAGRAPHS REMOVED FOR LEGAL REASONS.
In a recent attack on the independent state agency, Healthway, Premier Colin
Barnett uses the term “a misuse of public funds” and describes this misuse in
being “used for private benefit, is simply unacceptable”. This outburst,
according to media reports, has put the future of this agency “in serious
doubt”.
I am sure the York community and the ratepayers of WA welcome your stated
interest in some of its affairs and look forward to seeing the positive results
provided by your future intervention in your capacity as Shadow Minister for
Local Government & Communities.
Your sincerely
David Taylor
York Ratepayer.
There is no date on this letter so I can only assume it was drafted some time ago because he refers to the Ministers response to the Shire's response to the show cause notice which. The Minister has since ignored.
ReplyDeleteThe letter IS dated 16 February 2015, so Templeman is six weeks behind the ball.
ReplyDeleteYep not up with it. The problems in fitzgerald related to the past council and the show cause notice was soundly exposed as a stich up. But the opposition spokesman makes the valid point - what is the local member doing for York. Mia should be batting for the community but seems her cabinet position is more important to her.
ReplyDeleteMia who?
ReplyDeleteJust joking
Mia has aligned herself too closely with Tony Simpson, watch this space though, Tony's political world is about to implode.
ABC radio this morning the vicious vindictive emperor colon showed his true colours by saying local government accountability needed to be strongly increased and to watch this space. So his reform process failed through his governments bungling and his response is to blame local government and now we will punish you. Childish bullying. But now simpson the donkey and his DLG thugs will be let loose on more innocent councils. The retraining camps will be overflowing. But hopefully the DLG will get its name right and that we are now in 2015. This blog needs to employ extra staff.
ReplyDeleteIn his letter, Templeman states, "I believe that it is right to see the process through without political interference, in particular as the FitzGerald Report did raise some reasonable queries about the administration of the Shire of York".
ReplyDeleteSo it's all eyes on James to do his best.
I think Templeman misses the point. The Fitzgerald "report" relates to the previous administration and council. The probity audit related to the new council under Cr Reid and then suspended under trumped up charges that were soundly refuted by the council before being gagged. But I suspect his view is why should he get involved when the local member Mia Davies won't.
ReplyDeleteMia has aligned herself with Tony Simpson.
ReplyDeleteSHE WILL NOT INVOLVE HERSELF UNTIL SHE IS FORCED TO, OR UNTIL SHE CAN POLITICALLY POINT SCORE!
On the evidence provided by his letter, I would say that Mr Templeman is unlikely to show more competence in the job than the minister he is hoping to replace. He seems incapable of listening attentively or reading accurately. Why otherwise would he not have understood that the Fitz Gerald Report examined events that had occurred under the Boyle and Hooper presidencies, not during the presidency of Matthew Reid, a far more intelligent, capable and community-minded figure than either of his predecessors. Is this the kind of lazy thinking we can expect from an ALP state government?
ReplyDeleteI suppose we have to recognise that the Wheatbelt is of no interest to WA Labor (not many Labor votes here, after all, so why should they bother) and of not much interest to the conservative parties, except as a comfortable perch for self seeking opportunists like...oh, never mind, but look no further than Northam.