Date: February 19, 2014
Hon. Tony Simpson
Minister for Local Government & Communities
Dear Minister,
Your Ref: Letter
from Jenni Law.(see attached)
The letter from your Jenni Law could be considered condescending in tone,
and banal in content.
Furthermore Ms Law could not even get the date of this, signed, letter of
response right, unless she created a stock-standard letter of reply in February
2014.
She did save the worst for last, claiming she is the Director of Logal
Government Regulation and Support.
This gives rise to the old truism “Wunce Ey culdnt eevan spel Derecta ov Logal
Govmunt Regolatoin un Siport- noew Ey ah wun.
It is reasonable to suggest that you should peremptorily suspend her, thereby
giving her the opportunity to embrace some specialized literary training so in
future she does not make herself and your office the laughing stock of all the
residents and ratepayers of the State of Western Australia.
Yours sincerely
David Taylor
York Ratepayer.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ms. Rachel Donkin Government Media Director
Dear Ms. Donkin
Your Ref: LAME BRAIN LETTERS FROM PUBLIC SERVANTS (Please Note Attachment)
Congratulations on your appointment as Government Media Director. It is a bit sad about Dixie Marshall. Her colourful profanity was a source of great amusement amid the Media.
However, if words are like weapons you are bound to do yourself some collateral damage.
I am sure it comes as no surprise to you that some of the written responses to public questions delivered-up by public servants are cringe value only, and damage the reputation of the government.
As one example I draw your attention to the above response from Ms. Jenni Law. Arguably she is a public service nonentity with delusions of grandeur, buried in the Dickensian bowels of the Department of Local Government workhouse, shuffling York community’s ‘great expectations” from one dead file-pile to another. She even has the date wrong, unless she wrote it a year ago, on February 16, 2014.
Several paragraphs in this letter are public servant gibberish at its very worst. Ms Law has no idea if the remains of the suspended York Shire Council are doing their lessons or not, and an even less idea of a positive end result. The last paragraph is purely sanctimonious cant.
Prior to the next State Election it may be wise to put out an edict that any written public servant response has the recipients name at the top, the date, and an unintelligible signature at the bottom. The rest of the page should be blank . This could give the public the delusion that there may have been something on the page that bore some tiny resemblance to an intelligible straight answer to a question.
Yours sincerely
David Taylor York Ratepayer
Your Ref: LAME BRAIN LETTERS FROM PUBLIC SERVANTS (Please Note Attachment)
Congratulations on your appointment as Government Media Director. It is a bit sad about Dixie Marshall. Her colourful profanity was a source of great amusement amid the Media.
However, if words are like weapons you are bound to do yourself some collateral damage.
I am sure it comes as no surprise to you that some of the written responses to public questions delivered-up by public servants are cringe value only, and damage the reputation of the government.
As one example I draw your attention to the above response from Ms. Jenni Law. Arguably she is a public service nonentity with delusions of grandeur, buried in the Dickensian bowels of the Department of Local Government workhouse, shuffling York community’s ‘great expectations” from one dead file-pile to another. She even has the date wrong, unless she wrote it a year ago, on February 16, 2014.
Several paragraphs in this letter are public servant gibberish at its very worst. Ms Law has no idea if the remains of the suspended York Shire Council are doing their lessons or not, and an even less idea of a positive end result. The last paragraph is purely sanctimonious cant.
Prior to the next State Election it may be wise to put out an edict that any written public servant response has the recipients name at the top, the date, and an unintelligible signature at the bottom. The rest of the page should be blank . This could give the public the delusion that there may have been something on the page that bore some tiny resemblance to an intelligible straight answer to a question.
Yours sincerely
David Taylor York Ratepayer
Date: January 17, 2015.
JENNI LAW
DIRECTOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND SUPPORT
Gordon Stephenson House
140 William Street
PERTH WA 6000
Your Ref: E1504044 Y1- 18#14
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE RESPONSE
Dear Ms Law
Thank you for you emailed response to my correspondence dated January 16, 2015 regarding your Show Cause Notice.
It must have taken you years to perfect this kind of trite response. I believe it is called a Diploma in Public Service Bilge-101.
Yes the tenor of my correspondence was extremely angry and critical of the level of competence shown by your department and Minister Simpson. A view apparently now shared by Premier Colin Barnett, who, according to Press Reports, is trying to lay the blame for the local government reform fiasco at the feet of Minister Simpson.
Tony Simpson has and I quote ‘been hung out to dry” by Mr. Barnett. You and others may well end up on the same clothesline.
You say we should be assured that at all times the process (the Show Cause Notice) was followed in accordance with advice received. That advice is your problem!
I think you may find that the opportunity for elected members to embrace the specialised training being offered by the Department (Puppy School for Maligned Members) has yet to ensure anything. It has not happened.
Please refrain from disgracing yourself by using sycophantic platitudes such as “they can return to office in a position to be able to provide good governance for all the residents and ratepayers of the Shire”. Who do you think you are talking about?- Kindergarten-Kids!
If there has been any failure, as Director of Local Government Regulation, that failure is yours.
Enjoy yourself until the next State Election.
Yours sincerely
David Taylor York Ratepayer.
Just goes to show the level of contempt these people have for the public.
ReplyDeleteMs. Law must have gone to the same school of rudeness as Ray Hooper. She is another one who has forgotten she is paid by the public purse.
DeleteBrilliant letter David.
I say again - David, please nominate for Council.
And exactly how long do you think David would last on Council before the two Jenni's f****d him over? Forget who you elect, if those elected don't conform with the sadistic narcissistic personalities at the Department, they will go the same way as Mathew Reid.
DeleteThe two Jenni's, David and Brad, need elected members they can control, dull people like Boil, Hooper and Duperouzel, with low self esteem, easily manipulated with a little disingenuous flattery.
Don't push anyone into standing who does not want to be there 100%. It is too big of a commitment.
DeleteWell there we have it, such encouragement and yet another good reason to not stand up and be counted at the 2015 Council elections!
ReplyDeleteOn one hand we have the DLG (who have severely let this community down) now dictating the future of our Councillors when they could do with a good deal of training themselves.
Then with the apathy in York is it any surprise we had such unqualified specimens we called Councillors pre 2013.
The residents and ratepayers of York have an awful lot to answer for with all that has happened. Lets hope they vote at the next elections for the people standing for Council who will make a difference to the COMMUNITY and not their own back pockets!
Every single letter any of us gets from anyone in the department firstly states (not literally of course) but my interpretation "I will ignore all of your actual questions and give you a summary of what you already know." They really make me angry!
ReplyDeleteI am looking forward to watching the expert old farts of the town who hang around in the Avon Terrace Café strip (sorry for that slight exaggeration - hardly a strip) give us their spiel because obviously they will all stand for Council. They are mostly ageing ex-Councillors or individuals who rate themselves as worthy. They know everything about running the town (shame they sat in the sidelines and watched it's decline). Will we see them in the candidate line for the next election or are they all mouth and no trousers?
ReplyDeleteDoubt they will be able to stand the humiliation of getting just two votes.
DeleteI rather doubt we'll see many ex-councillors standing for election. The problem will likely be persuading anyone to stand after this year's kerfuffle with the DLGC.
DeleteForgive me, Miss Behaviour, but I think you're being too harsh on everyone. Did you 'sit on the sidelines and watch the town decline'? I admit that I did, and am deeply sorry for that now. Let's all resolve to do better in future. Are you planning to be a candidate for Council?
James you are probably right, I was a bit harsh but I am also a bit too passionate. It was a 'heat of the moment' comment I'm afraid.
DeleteHowever, I have never sat on the sidelines, if I have had anything to say then I have said it, if I had anything to do, I have done it and if anyone has been hurt, I stood by them.
I fully agree, we do need a new start for York and I am prepared to help that happen. To achieve the desired end result the whole community needs to take notice and ensure that the mistakes of the past are not allowed to recur.
Wounds need to be healed and until they are no progress will be made.
DLG response is unbelievable. What it shows is that they cannot answer the questions truthfully and incriminate themselves, so simply ignore the question. A great display of probity, open and accountable government as it applies to the DLG, and guilt. Keep asking the questions, just escalate up the line.
ReplyDeleteThank you David for posting the D L G response .The simple version
ReplyDeleteprara 1, thank you David for your concerns
2, We have noted your concerns however given the tenor of your correspondence you can get stuffed I will only make a general comment
3,We did not sack the council it was Tony who did it as dont blame us we had nothing to do with it was all Tony. We only gave him the advise that we received
4,Now we will retrain your councilors to be just like the old regime the towns folk were so happy with ray .Perhaps he will do the training
With Love and Best Wishes
Yours Jen
This whole saga is so Monty Pythons Flying Circus they tried there Best to sell us a dead parrot, did the fish slap dance , sang to us for we are lumber jack and did the walk from the ministries of silly walks
Beven
Lots of inquiries asking how many 'hits' the Blog has had to date..........62383
ReplyDelete"Be assured that at all times the process was followed in accordance with the advice received".
ReplyDeleteSounds as though the Department is ever so slightly on the back foot !
Rather than 'be assured' because they/she claim you ought be, FOI them and see if they/she is being truthful or actually running foul of the Public Interest Disclosure Act of 2003 and serving their/her own interests rather than the tax/rate payers they/she have been employed to serve.
DeleteMy questions for Ms Laws:
ReplyDelete1. What was the advice that was followed?
2. Who gave that advice?
3. What was the advice based on?
4. why Did the advice include advice from York shire councillors, past and present, and disgruntled shire staff, past and present, or did it come solely from employees of your department?
5. Were any of the 'advisers' political associates of the Minister?
6. Why has the minister refused to explain or discuss his reasons for ignoring the Shire's detailed, well-documented and brilliantly argued response to his amateurish, wretchedly drafted and deceitful 'show cause' notice?
7. Why is the minister so determined to suppress the Fitz Gerald Report, which raises serious concerns about the even-handedness of your department in dealing (or failing to deal) with the York Shire Council's problems? Is some kind of cover-up in progress?
8. What kind of training does the department propose to provide to the York Shire councillors? Who will deliver it? What are the topics to be covered? Where will it take place and at whose expense? Will prospective councillors be invited or allowed to take part? If not, why not? When will it start?
As I'm sure Ms Laws and her minister understand that the people have York have no confidence that neither the minister nor his department intends to do the right thing by our shire.
The minister must have been a much better pastrycook than he is a politician. Otherwise, he and his family would have starved.
Sir Buh is there any chance you can do the FOI on this one to lighten the load for those of us already up to our ears in FOI's?
DeleteA good example of how probity only applies down the line and not up. The DLG talks the talk but does not walk the walk. But this is now on the public record for posterity and hopefully soon we will have much more.
ReplyDeleteI reckon David needs to now take this up with Matthews, and then the Minister so that their responses are also on the record. Also, take it up with Mia so that she knows she is not being left out - and needs to take action or continue to ignore the York community.
Finally, the Emperor is now saying that local government mergers will be voluntarily - but hang on, has he not been saying all along that there were no forced mergers!!!! So there, plain as day, is the standard of probity in State Government and the Liberal Party.
Hi David, not only is the date wrong on Ms. Laws letter, seems Ms. Law is the DIRECTOR LOGAL GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND SUPPORT.
ReplyDeleteThe C in LOCAL near her signature looks remarkably like a G to me. Compare it with the C in the word DIRECTOR.
Perhaps Ms, Law should undertake some retraining, starting with spelling!
Had the dumb b***h written the letter on the 16 January, one might have been able to forgive her, festive cheer etc.
ReplyDeleteFor a public serpant of Ms Law's seniority not to know what year it is, may explain an awful lot. For example, was it the Departments original intention to conduct a probity report for the year 2013 but Ms Flaw inadvertently entered the wrong date on the requisition form and the rest is history?
Another nice bitch slap
ReplyDeleteBefore anyone bites my head off, a bitch slap is street talk for an expression of mild contempt, it is in no way a sexist comment.
DeleteMaybe 'bitch slap' isn't a sexist comment, but it is speciesist. My kelpie X Katie was deeply offended by that post, Anonymous. She says that just as only black people can use the N.... word, and only LGBT people are entitled to use the Q.... word, so use of the word 'bitch' should be restricted to dogs, and female dogs at that. I'm old enough to remember when the expression 'gay dog' was still being used to describe a male sybarite. Thank goodness, it has long ago vanished from the lexicon.
DeleteCome on guys, these are just simple public servants, they can't be expected to know what year it is let alone spell their own position. They are there to make sure YOU do not make mistakes, they make the rules but don't have to abide by any themselves. Good gracious me, what a novel concept. But i suggest David needs to escalate this letter directly to Matthews for action, and then her response to the Minister. That way their responses can be on the public record - and they hate that.
ReplyDeleteWonder how Ms. Mathews would feel if she was served a Show Cause Notice requesting reasons why Ms. Law should not be suspended and retrained, sighting Ms, Laws inability to know the correct name of her section or what year it is.
ReplyDeleteAll jokes aside it is very disconcerting to me that Ms Matthews can't even get the basics right. It seems she and David Morris are the ones who advised the Minister re the show cause notice. Worrisome!
ReplyDeleteGiven the glaring errors in the 'official' State Government letter Ms. Law signed, it is concrete evidence these people are incompetent.
ReplyDeleteWhat mistakes did they make in their reporting of their York visits?
This should now trigger a full investigation into all reports written by Ms. Mathews Staff leading up to, and the preparation of, the Show Cause Notice recommendation to Minister Simpson.
They cannot claim clerical errors on the letter, not when you are using a State Government official letter head.
It is not good enough - these people are on very good Public purse Salaries.
What is Ms Matthews getting paid for? Is she responsible for anything as the DG? She is the head of an inept, incompetent department, for example not only York, but also the advice to Simpson on local government reform. She should be sacked but cant see that happening so the anti local government department will limp on making fools of themselves. At least they provide some light relief and is an easy target for ridicule, particularly when they are supposed to set the example. Spell check 101 before probity for beginners and investigations for dummies.
ReplyDelete