In hundreds of brightly lit newsrooms around the world, senior journalists sit
down to write the daily EDITORIAL OPINION COLUMN.
It is usually published with anonymity of authorship, and is neither absolute
fact nor pure fiction. It often reflects the newspaper Editors’ and sometimes
its Board of Directors’ parsimonious stance on what they conceive to be matters
of public interest and importance.
‘The Shire of York Blog’ and ‘The Real Voice of York’ have broadcast numerous opinions,
both anonymous and sourced. Unlike newspaper editorial opinion columns that may
be clouded by corporate self-interest, they have reflected diverse public
opinion on serious issues that directly affect the whole of a small local
community.
Those with a great deal of self-interest have suggested these opinions are
subversive and called the authors ‘extremists’ and ‘trouble-makers’. They have
called on everyone to forget the past and look to the future.
Unfortunately, the only way to forget the past is to acknowledge it, rectify
it- then move on. This is the ethos that these two on-line publications have
attempted to promote, in both a humorous and serious, eclectic manner.
In his formal letter of resignation from Council, Matthew Reid, states, that
neither the current Shire of York Administration and the Department of Local Government,
adhere to the principles of open, accountable and transparent local government
governance or intend to engage in community consultation and collaboration.
This means that the role of President of the Shire of York requires a massive
devotion of time and energy, being a full-time commitment to ensure that the
Shire of York Administration is directly and totally answerable to the Shire of
York Council- post October 17, 2015.
There are two Shire of York Council
candidates who, if elected, meet all the criteria needed to assume Mr Reid’s role,
as President, through having the time, energy, and the ability to offer a
fulltime commitment to encourage, indeed ensure a positive renaissance of York.
This is not a direct endorsement, but encouragement to allow York Ratepayers to
pursue their democratic rights through selecting those who can best serve the
community as its leaders. You should be able to locate these two people when you read their
Candidate Profile.
ANNONYMOUS……( has been in the print
media industry for 34 years, including 14 as a Senior Editorial Manager, 6 on a
newspaper’s Editorial Board of Management, and
4 within the WA Government’s parliamentary system.)
ANNONYMOUS, the democratic rights you refer to are the democratic rights the Department of Local Government allow us. One striking example being the unprecedented number of votes Matthew Reid received at the last election, the very same democratic process I presume you are referring to?
ReplyDeleteThen what happened?
Our democratic rights are not in the gift of the DLGC. That convocation of wallies pushed the Minister into suspending Council as the Act allows, thus frustrating our democratic rights by putting them in abeyance. I don't think even Minister Simpson would be fool enough to try that trick again. Anyway, we still have our rights - the DLG can't abolish them. Keep the faith!
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with you James, although, I think your description of the DLGC as a "convocation of wallies" is far too polite, but then I would expect that from an academically gifted potential Councillor such as yourself.
DeleteThe last time I encountered a congenerous convocation of wallies equal to that of the DLGC, was over a decade ago, while in Berkshire, on a hunt.... verstehen?
Tricia Walters & Denese Smythe.....God help us.
ReplyDeleteTricia and Denese are honest women with a track record of involvement in activities benefiting the York community. Please don't sneer at people who have made a real contribution to the shire and have the courage - unlike many others - to act and speak up openly.
DeleteDer der, wrong answer, its got nothing to do with honesty or involvement, it comes down to ability and common sense, neither has the ability or qualities required to fulfill the role.
DeleteHonesty is just as important as ability. Commonsense is a very scarce commodity, which, along with honesty, I would be reluctant to ascribe to anyone who dishes out insults from a position of anonymity. Why not say who you are and make your point with some regard for courtesy?? Then decent people might be more inclined to take your crass opinions seriously (not promising, mind).
ReplyDelete