Shire of York

Shire of York

Tuesday 25 August 2015

THE COMMUNITY MOUSE THAT ROARED

Last year the citizens of York came out swinging, punching well above their weight and proving to be formidable scrappers. It was in response to the whole community being maligned by the Minister for Local Government, Tony Simpson, and later, his Commissioner, James, ‘don’t call me Jimmy’ Best, who decided, York, was awash with self- interested extremists.

Much of the roaring came in the form of the on-line content of the shireofyork6302.blog with an initial focus being on the leaking of the clandestine Fitz Gerald Report.

The lengths that the ‘Powers that Be’ finally went to, to keep this document a secret, could be described as herculean, an abject failure- and extremely disturbing in a modern, open society sense.

It is pretty hard to control the whereabouts of the 25 copies held by the Shire of York, the single copy’s held by the Department of Local Government (and Communities), the Minister, Tony Simpson, the WA Corruption & Crime Commission( CCC) and last but not least, the naughty person we will call “Brian”. (Why so many copies were created, originally, is a mysterious abrogation of responsibility for any form of confidentiality in itself.)

You could probably add some photocopies printed out at the offices of Michael Fitz Gerald Strategies office and from the other 28 copies floating around the traps. But especially the 25 copies held at the Shire of York offices which is no Fort Knox.

There were certainly enough self-interested, sycophantic worshippers of former CEO, Ray Hooper, to ensure a copy was hand-delivered to his private eerie in Alexander Heights before the ink had dried.

Yet a super-sleuth from the CCC was adamant that it was “Brian” who had given a copy to be published in The West Australian Newspaper and used it for other nefarious purposes such as broadcast by social media.

Did “Brian” have a copy of the Fitz Gerald Report at that time? No he did not! Did” Brian” give a copy of the Fitz Gerald Report to The West Australian Newspaper to scour through? How could he, he did not have one!

Members of the Perth Press think that the CCC is ‘insidious and sinister’ and a recent external investigation found there was ‘systemic misconduct” within its ranks, including theft. In the life of “Brian” you can add false allegations to the CCC’s impressive list of negative achievements.

So what did some usual suspects in the Shire of York set about doing with that beastly Fitz Gerald Report and a disgusting social media site?

In August last year there was a flurry of high priority ‘panic room’ emails sent between F……….r, Commercial Lawyers and International Attorney’s and the Shire of York regarding the Fitz Gerald Report and http://shireofyork6302.com.au .

Little verbatim cliché’s like ‘ this is going from bad to worse, ‘the Shire needs to get an injunction’ and ‘we need to discuss this urgently’ were bandied about. (At a substantial fee of course).
Then came advice like ‘time though is of the essence’, I have rung two IT forensic experts I hold in high regard. Both reverted (probably means referred) to me’.

Mr…………..’ is looking at what can be found to assist your objectives of identifying the blog and taking steps to take it down’.

‘The other is Professor………………. (This Professor is an Adjunct/ Assistant Professor at the Centre for Forensic Science at the University of Western Australia. (Why an academic would soil his hands with such a low rent activity as removing a Vox Populi, blogsite escapes me.)

It goes on-and-on.

“Try and make a call on who might have done this (the blog) and target them directly’ was one friendly sentence of expensive advice.

Then ‘The relief might lie in what is known as the as an Anton Pillar (it is actually Piller) Order which is an ex parte order allowing the ceasing (I am assume this should be seizing) of computers for limited specified purposes’. This is a polite way of putting- let’s kick a few doors in and confiscate a lap top or two- with several spelling mistakes thrown in for free.

Next came ‘ Go after Google to get the site taken down; go after the likely suspect who put the site up………..neither option is cheap’.

The way that the Shire of York went about the business of burying the Fitz Gerald Report, cheap was never an option. Why such an attempt was made to pervert a cause for justice, should make those responsible hang their heads in abject shame.

Everyone should remember what was and is the Fitz Gerald Report. It was a substantial, substantive record of interview describing the ill treatment meted out by some councillors and some staff of the Shire of York to nineteen (19) members of the community. It suggests malice, the possible use  of municipal funds for personal rather than definable, appropriate council matters and certainly suggests inappropriate actions that do not  come close to satisfying the new buzz-phrase ‘reasonable community expectations’.

Maintain the rage and never stop roaring. It is your personal right to do so.

7 comments:

  1. The Point when you try to bury something you should always be careful not to bury yourself further that what your trying to bury.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have my unqualified agreement and support. The way the Shire of York, specifically Cr Hooper, former councillors Boyle and Duperouzel, former Commissioner James Best and the ridiculous Acting CEO Simpson have dealt with the Fitz Gerald Report is nothing short of a disgraceful attempt to conceal the truth from the public gaze. Thankfully, the report is freely available on your blog and mine for the whole world to see.

    Neither of us has yet published the supporting documents, but I believe we both have access to them and will post them when the time is ripe, as Sir Humphrey Appleby might say.

    The goons did have a shot at Google about this blog but as I recall were politely rebuffed. I can't imagine anybody would seriously consider applying for an Anton Piller order except in the case of criminal or terrorist activity. (When you start recruiting for ISIS or promoting the use of methamphetamine, I'll be the first to dob you in to the authorities.)

    Your summary of the report is perfect.

    Please convey my condolences to 'Brian', who was falsely accused of leaking the report. If he had done so, I would have recommended him for the title of Australian of the Year.

    What a corrupt and dishonest system we in York live under. My maxim is this: when people in government at any level hide or lie about something that has nothing to do with public safety or security from the community, it is usually because they are afraid, with good reason, of community opinion. Luckily, the truth is great and sooner or later will prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Does any one know how much of Ratepayers money was spent on this exercise?



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would guess a little over 4K.

      Delete
  4. Obviously no one at the Shire has ever heard of Voltaire.

    This skullduggery doesn't surprise me, it's the action of an organization in tatters, falling apart at the seams, thrashing out at anything and everything it sees as a threat, regardless of cost. This goes a long way toward explaining why so many consultants are feeding from the trough, the admin staff spend all their time preparing excuses.

    Not a fine-hour for the lawyer acting on behalf of the Shire but at the time the cash-cow needing milking.

    When Brian discovered that certain public servants had accused him of heinous acts, such as leaking information to the media and those dreadful bloggy things, he voiced his concerns to the 'protector' who in turn passed it onto the protectors protector.

    Who pays for these protectors?....The good ratepayers of York, at a cost of in excess of $350,000.00 per annum, about a thousand dollars a day, It's a risky business!

    Brian was advised, by the old woman who lives in the cupboard, that public servants can say whatever they want about whoever they want because the information is privileged, absolutely privileged at that, so there, nah nah nana nahh nana nahhhh.

    The City Carpet Cleaners, who incidentally, I would not recommend as they have a habit of leaving stains after the jobs finished, have their own rules which quite clearly say that public servants cannot over shampoo the carpet, if they do, and they get caught, they could end up washing laundry for five years.

    Luckily, Brian always looks on the bright side, he figures, that if he goes down so do the rest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally don't understand, has this anything to do with James Best?

      Delete
    2. I agree. Writing in riddles is stupid - say it how it is or don't say it at all.

      Delete