On
April 4, 2016, an email was sent to the Shire of York Administration office titled
SHIRE OF YORK EMPLOYMENT POLICY with reference to a
letter MC15-280586 from the Department of Immigration and Border Protection {SEC=UNCLASSIFIED }
The email, in the form of an external memorandum, was directed to the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Tyhscha Cochrane, and Human Resources Officer, Gail Maziuk, informing them of
correspondence on behalf of the Minister
for Immigration, Peter Dutton, regarding a Shire of York
Administration employee Christian Tarou Chadwick.
Information provided by the Minister suggested that should in future, Mr
Chadwick, be found guilty of another criminal offence under the Australian
Criminal Code Act 1995, or otherwise fail the requirements of the character test (Section 501),
he could be subject to a deportation
order and be returned to his country
of origin (New Zealand) under Section
501, the Migration Act, 1958. (Mr. Chadwick has since been remanded on
bail on further serious criminal charges.)
It was suggested to Ms. Cochrane and Ms. Maziuk that, given their administrative
positions and their knowledge of some negative incidents and circumstances
involving Mr. Chadwick’s employment with the Shire of York Council
Administration, they should seek to advise him of his potentially parlous
position.
This, in all procedural fairness, was that given the content of letter MC15-280586, Mr. Chadwick should obtain
legal advice regarding his family situation and any other pertinent facts that
could give rise to the revocation of his Australian
Visa and/or Permanent Resident Status should these be cancelled.
Also, in the past, apparent, supportive actions taken by certain Shire of
York Administration Officers may be construed as being to the personal
detriment of Mr. Chadwick placing him in the unenviable position of having his
actions in his employment and as a member of the local community closely
scrutinized and then adversely publicised.
It appeared that Mr. Chadwick may have assumed he could engage in unacceptable behaviour
within the workplace with impunity because Shire of York Administrative
Officers appeared to fail in their duty-of-care to other employees under the Occupational
Safety and Health Act, 1984, the Occupational Safety and Health Care
Regulations, 1996, similar obligations under Worksafe WA and the Criminal
Code Amendment (Racial Vilification) Act, 2004.
In the circumstances, such support could also be exposed as serious
inadequacies in the Shire of York Administration’s knowledge, then involvement and handling of employment related
issues, regarding Mr. Chadwick, as his employer, under the Acts and Regulations
defined above.
Also that these employment issues, including alleged bullying, harassment and
racial abuse of co-workers by Mr. Chadwick in the workplace, could be
considered by the Department of
Immigration as additional significant reasons under the requirements of the character test (Section 501) to have him considered for
deportation.
It is not known if Ms. Cochrane or Ms. Maziuk responded to this memorandum in
any manner other than the fact that the Shire
of York Council was not advised.
If they did approach Mr. Chadwick with these concerns then it appears to have
had little effect.
It is now understood that Mr. Chadwick may already be in serious breach of his
bail conditions through being in violation of a restraining order caused by him
making obscene gestures and being verbally threatening and abusive to the alleged
victim(s) in the criminal case against him.
These acts are alleged to have occurred during Mr. Chadwick’s rostered working
hours and he committed the alleged offence while in a Shire of York Council vehicle.
Should this be confirmed by a reliable independent witness(s) and/ or the WA
Police then the Shire of Your Council will have no other option than demand
that its Chief Executive Officer terminate Mr. Chadwick’s employment immediately-
otherwise be seen as condoning an illegal/criminal act.
The Shire of York Council is now advised that the Director, Character Assessment
and Cancellations Branch of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection forwarded information on the
case of Mr. Chadwick to the relevant area of the Department for their
consideration on-or –about March 10, 2016.
It can be assumed that he is on its watch & act list.
David Taylor.
Great article David - thank you. Very interesting information.
ReplyDeleteThe community knew Ms. Cochrane and Ms. Maziuk were failing in their duty of care towards a number of employees.
Would anyone listen? No!
Cochranes and Maziuks first priority was always to make sure their precious Chadwick kept his job!
Majority of the community are relieved to see the end of the Cochrane and Maziuk era.
Few more Hooper acolytes to be weeded out yet. They are easily identified - they are the ones bleating about the reshuffle.
Is there any reason why Mr Alan Rourke has not been mentioned during the Chadwick saga, after all, he is the manager of Works?
ReplyDeleteTR31 May 2016 at 15:35 You may find he was overruled by the females running the Shire, no one could question them because they were always right!
ReplyDeleteI beg to differ Anonymous 31 May. You may find that Mr Rourke barley steps foot down at the depot and would not have a clue what is happening with the staff down there. There is very little respect shown for him as he pays none to them.
ReplyDeleteYes too much time in the office becomes counter productive.
ReplyDelete