Firstly the alleged ‘thumbs-up’ for the Shire’s position by the Minister for Planning, Rita Saffioti, could just as well have been the middle digit as she has every right to say it is actually none of her business and probably did- and certainly will when push comes to shove.
Never trust a wounded elephant or a politician. Her correspondence may have contained a few of the right platitudes but the underlying message could well have been ‘Shire of York emptor’- York beware, meaning some due care is possible, but forget any responsibility.
And of course the government department that Ms. Saffioti takes care of, called the Department of Planning, contains the West Australian Planning Commission that appears to have been considered another potential friend by Chief Executive Officer, Paul Martin, and his executive crew.
Certainly this department claims to consider all interests including environmental and community wants. Unfortunately it also considers both economic and political needs so if Allawuna Farm is the cheapest alternative, the proponents have lobbied cleverly and the dump is not going to be in a Labour held seat- then guess what!
So read this shire sob story and weep:- and remember ‘implied’ means maybe yes-or maybe no and ‘not complied with’ means the shire did not do what it was supposed to do!
"Therefore, whilst the 42-day timeframe to provide the executed documents was not complied with, it was understood at the time that there was an awareness and implied level of consent to the Shire’s position within the correspondence between the Shire on the one hand, and the office of the Minister and the Western Australian Planning Commission on the other hand."
A little assumption is a very dangerous thing.
And now the shire has to deal with a gaggle of quasi-intellectuals including lawyers, accountants, psychologists, architects and a midwife called the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT).
Would they care that WA has the worst earthquake tremors in the nation with 5.7 and 4.7 magnitude quakes in the South West this year. ( Both Meckering and York are in this area of instability. )
And given that these earthquakes were at a shallow depth they would probably tear the walls of a landfill site apart. Would this register on SAT’s Richter Scale?- probably not!
The fact that the most recent road death statistics show that 8 people have died and 32 seriously injured on Great Southern Highway between the Lakes and St. Ronan’s well between 2001 and 2016 probably does not register either.
Nor would the fact that heavy haulage movements will increase a massive 3.5 times, per day-existentially increasing the possibility of road trauma by a similar amount.
So good luck with SAT because there is probably not one environmentalist among them, not one of them lives in the Wheatbelt and maybe none of them has ever spent time in the town of York.
Cr
Ferro sporting
No
landfill attire
|
David Taylor.
The elected individuals involved in overseeing the running of local government have absolutely no comprehension that their actions and inactions have the potential to cause significant harm to members of the community.
ReplyDeleteThe democratically elected officials have but one mandate, to act in the best interest of the people of the district, regardless of any social standing, ethnicity, or whether resident or ratepayer. Upon election to office, they are required to swear an oath/affirmation to that effect, empty rhetoric if ever there was.
As alluded to in the article, one person was elected to council on the platform of no landfill in York. Above all, this one person should have spearheaded action to slam shut every conceivable door allowing landfill development in the Shire of York. This person has abysmally failed in their duty.
As if things couldn’t get any worse, how Trumpingly ironic, that one democratically elected official is now threatening defamation action against certain members of the community for essentially exercising their democratic right to speak their mind regarding matters that will undoubtedly have significant detrimental consequences to their lives and livelihoods.
Small wonder people prefer to remain anonymous when expressing disapproval of anybody or anything to do with the Shire of York, its agents, benefactors and beneficiaries.
"Caveat Shire of York", actually - not "Shire of York emptor". 'Caveat' is warning and 'emptor' is one who purchases.
ReplyDeletePity we didn't see through that person before we voted. I agree, that person failed the community abysmally.
ReplyDeleteYork seems to be a magnet for bullies threatening people with defamation claims.
Just remember folks, these bullies are nothing more than tormented souls struggling to exist in our world.
Umm...yes Jane Ferro, most disappointing. Quite happy to ride on a wave of public support, once invested though, we're dropped like a hot brick.
ReplyDeleteJane Ferro got what she wanted.
ReplyDeleteCan't believe we didn't see through her.
Do voters feel let down by Jane Ferro? Absolutely!