Shire of York

Shire of York

Monday 22 February 2016

THE SIMPSONS (Episode 2015, titled “The Jolly Best of Luck”, based on a true story.)

The Simpsons is a Local Government farcical, cartoon character comedy set in the fictitious town of Springfield, which is actually the Shire of York.

Graeme Simpson stars as Homer, the feckless Acting CEO of the town and Tony Simpson, as the Local Government Minister Mr. Burns, the archetypal, political villain who loathes Springfield and its citizens,

There is Brad Jolly as Bart Simpson, the ignorant brat who thinks non-compliance means probity and James Best is Waylon Smithers, Mr Burns’ Local Government Commissioner ‘love child’ who comes to Springfield to teach its miscreant citizens a thing or two.

Episode 2015 is based on the formal release of Freedom of Information documents requested by some citizens of Springfield concerned about the size of Waylon Smithers pay-check compared to what he was actually up to.

Originally, Homer was asked if Mr. Smithers was double dipping, being paid $63,933.72 as Commissioner and then $39,000 (Inc. GST) as a consultant who had also brought his Hames Sharley ’Ouija Board’ to summon forth the spirits of visioning and the poltergeists of ideation?

Homer’s answer was ‘yep’ for the cost for both the consultant mumbo-jumbo and the Commissioners Fees.

That is actually both a ‘yep’ and a bit of a ‘nope’ Homer.  

It is now known that the Tax Invoice (WA) 010321) from Hames Sharley for Smithers’ Review of Springfield Local Planning Strategy was for $39,000 with $36,000 going to Smithers.

But, the official Springfield Credit Payments Listing for the payment to Hames Sharley for the Review of Springfield Local Planning Strategy was for Tax Invoice (WA 01030 (wrong invoice) and for $41,775.53 (wrong amount.) Now that is $2,775.53 worth of funny business.

The Credit Payment Listing also suggests Mr. Smithers was paid $13,200 per month, which over a six month period, works out to be $79,200, with an additional $8,000 allowance for Springfield ‘sleepovers’.

Springfield also paid $19,000 in legal fees in this time. Normally you do not have to pay for lawyers if you have done nothing wrong.

Adding up the cost of Smithers monumental achievements, over a six month period he left Springfield close to $1 million poorer.

So this is what makes The Simpsons so much fun to watch.

Then ‘gasp’ we find that Smithers may not be Mr. Burns love-child after all.

Homer tells Springfield that Mr. Burns wanted a commissioner and a trainer/mentor to bring Springfield into line.

A very grumpy Mr. Burns responds to Homer, telling him that neither he or his Department of Local Government and Communities approved or endorsed additional payments to be made to Mr. Smithers to undertake either community visioning or council training.

Also, that Homer better tell this to Springfield or else, because he lied to its citizens.

However you have to give it to Homer. He turns around and effectively calls Mr. Burns a liar, reminding him of his initial letter of instruction indicating that Mr. Smithers had been given a dual role carrying out the duties of the Council- and training.

Whether you believe the words of a either a politician or an Acting CEO depends on how far you can hurl a 5,000 kg elephant. Then Bart, one of Mr Burns’ favourite brats, puts in his two cents worth.

This is because as Executive Director, Sector Regulation and Support, Bart regulates nothing, supports nothing and had probably just had one of Mr Burns’ shiny Florsheim’s embedded between his buttocks because of his retarded efforts.

Initially Bart had been in it up to his eyebrows in Springfield, introducing Waylon Smithers to Homer in January 2015.

Bad brat Bart told Homer that Smithers was a jolly well qualified consultant in community visioning and both he and Mr Burns would support Homer in hiring Smithers to be both the Commissioner and a community vision consultant.

Later Homer gets a few guffaws from the audience when he makes the understatement of the year that from then on Bart ‘was very quiet during the whole process’.

It appears that Bart forgot to tell Mr. Burns about his sanctioning Homer to do the dual hiring. Then has the audacity to infer that he had never suggested that Smithers be hired, and paid extra, as a consultant.

Regarding Bart, you can believe what he tells you for the distance you can toss a Boeing 747.

Timing is an integral part of comedy and Burns and Bart had let all this visioning, training bullshit fester from January 2015 to September 2015 at an extremely expensive laugh a minute, and after Smithers had already left Springfield.

The big joke is that all this not so funny comedy of errors occurred when Springfield did not have a council because according to Mr. Burns, it had made too many errors. Now that is the biggest laugh of all and makes Mr. Burns look even more stupid.

Credits roll
David Taylor

Now you can read the FOI documents
.




























































































































































































































































































17 comments:

  1. Brilliant brilliant and brilliant.
    There's no end to it, poor little York has to carry the can and pay the price, for theft incompetence and corruption, shame on the Minister for believing his Department, I feel so sorry for Matthew, he gave it heart and soul and was screwed over big time, bastards all of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23 February 2016 at 00:19...... How very true. Not sure how these people can sleep at night.

      Delete
  2. Ive also seen Best's final visioning report which is amatuer to say the least. I'd like to see the scope of eorks, quote and agreed deliverables. There is no wsy they were met no matter who actually authorised it.

    James Best has zero shame! Jolly and Simpson should be terminated immediately and the Council should sue Best and Simpson.

    I can't beleive certain locals want to just "move on." They have a million reasons to be outraged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fear not Cadre, there are some brave souls working hard for the underground movement. This pillaging of Shire funds has gone on for too long, first Ray Hooper's municipally funded holidays for him and his biatch, along comes Matthew Reid elected into office by a massive majority, 12 months later the Minister suspends him and appoints James Best, a bigger crook than Hooper ever was. Hooper only managed to fritter away 300k over 10 years, James Best managed in excess of 625k in 6 months. That has to be a record!

      Delete
    2. Three hearty cheers and hats off to those working in the underground movement!

      The scum is slowly being exposed!

      Delete
    3. Best's visioning was a total farce.

      Many residents volunteered their time to work with James Best on his 'visioning groups' and have received no feed back or a copy of 'Best's final visioning report'.

      Is it true the Shire is only acknowledging the people 'they' chose/selected to work with James Best on various committees/groups?

      Delete
  3. Would you be kind enough to pen this to Colin Barnett please David? I'm happy to do it but your style of writing will get hid attention whereas I'm likely to be ignored. Please Cc Today Tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Too clever by half, and thus, too hard to follow. Using the actual names of the people involved throughout would make this far more readable and, presumably, effective/useful.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think your missing the point sir buh, its a farce, could well be an episode of the Simpsons although the Simpsons wouldn't be so hilarious. See it for what it is, a piss take.

    Read the documents, they speak for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brilliant piece of work David!

    Shameless bunch the lot of them.

    James Best and G. Simpson should refund the money.

    James Best had absolutely no idea how to conduct his so called Visioning meetings - he couldn't even turn up on time! It was evident early in the piece that Best had never conducted workshops before - it was a shambles.

    ReplyDelete
  7. From the Department of Local Government & Communities website

    Local Government Compliance Framework Last updated: 23/11/2015

    The Local Government Compliance Framework outlines the Department of Local Government and Communities (DLGC) approach to ensuring that the integrity of the local government sector is of the highest order. The framework provides transparency and gives the local government sector and the public certainty about DLGC's approach to managing complaints made against the sector (or individuals within it). DLGC's aim is to build good governance by promoting and enforcing compliance and encouraging all local governments to move beyond minimum compliance through continuous improvement. DLGC also aims to ensure that there is proper accountability of local governments to their communities. - See more at: https://www.dlgc.wa.gov.au/Publications/Pages/LG-Compliance-Framework.aspx#sthash.Bp36K5RC.dpuf

    A friend of mine has recently been given access to documents as part of a Freedom of Information request. Although the 'agency' is under a legal obligation to release documents which fall within the ambit of an application, for reasons only it knows, the agency has blatantly omitted documents which relate to a major transaction.

    By no means was this an innocent omission, on the contrary, the purpose was to cover up unauthorised transactions, one in particular. Even more interesting is that a senior official at the Department was advising an agency senior staff member how to bend the rules to avoid public scrutiny.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Compliance - 1 the action or fact of complying with a wish or command :

    The DLGC and the Shire of York Administration Staff need to study the word 'compliance' and it's meaning!

    ReplyDelete
  9. There have been multiple complaints and multiple disciplinary sanctions against the SOY over the years which is continuing today. Masuik and Cochrane have bandied this position around between them for years.

    What power does the FOI Commissioner have to do more than issuing notices over and over again of non compliance? Let me guess they have no powers other than to advise!

    Thats what the DLG have said for years then low and behold turns out they have the power to suspend council. If the FOI Commissioner has no power then its another farcical position.

    Freedom of info is our right worldwide. It shouldn't be complicated and under no circumstances should the SOY be unaccountable for distributing propaganda suggeesting asking for info is an imposition or added financial burden.

    A transparent LG will have minimum FOI requests

    ReplyDelete
  10. The new CEO will be used to highly qualified Senior Staff who do a good days work and it won't
    take long for him to figure out the poor quality senior staff he has inherited.

    ReplyDelete
  11. maybe he wont maybe he will be impressed shouldn't we let him decide that

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous 2 March 2016 at 05:06 - are you one of the senior staff grasping at straws?

    I am not aware anyone in the community has made decisions for the new CEO. He will assess the capabilities and qualifications - or lack there of - of the senior staff and act accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Will only take thirty seconds to assess three of the senior staff.

    ReplyDelete