Shire of York

Shire of York

Sunday, 30 April 2017

JENNIFER MATHEWS MAY BE CULLED

Jennifer Mathews
It is not an unfathomable equation why WA finances read like a Stephen King novel, - GST + 41 (Government Departments) + 41(Highly paid Department Heads) =`economic disaster including a local housing market horror story.

The Director General of the Department of Local Government (and Communities), Jennifer Mathews, has now made the hit list of those department heads who may have to seek a new direction, re-join the general public- and look for a job.

And- the new leader of the Opposition, Mike Nahan, may be in opposition for a lot longer than he thinks. He seems to feel that his WA Public Sector, Department Heads, were the best since sliced bread, being, apparently,  ‘the best people possible’.

With less than 50% of Local Government Areas meeting even the basic requirements of good governance and financial accountability , Nahan is wrong, and Matthews’ should have a 100% chance of losing her job.

Add the facts that, under Ms. Mathews watch, one city council has been sacked, the Shire of York suspended, Dowerin robbed blind, the WACCC investigating a string of councils including Exmouth and Port Hedland and the Lord Mayor of the City of Perth with a passport full of undeclared junkets, Mr. Nahan has a strange interpretation of what ‘best’ means.

As of today the media euphemism for see-you-later being “Agency Heads whose Future is Uncertain” includes the inimitable, mal-functioning Mathews.

Mr. Nahan may not be aware that WA has always been called the ‘Nanny State’ and there is a good reason why. It is claimed that we have 41 Government Departments compared to Victoria’s 7, New South Wale’s 10, and South Australia’s 22,  with 140 Local Government Areas that is over 30%  of Australia’s total.

All this for just 2.4 million people.

Ms. Mathews is another public servant who probably thought she deserved respect, without ever earning it.

Saturday, 29 April 2017

LIQUOR BARON’S CRASH LANDING- it is time Barry please and skol to Sargeant as his job disappears.

The man they called “the Power on Tap” Barry Sargeant, the Director General of Liquor Licencing has been removed from his licencing premises by the new government.

Shaken and stirred, Sargeant was shown the barroom door exit last week as the Premer, Mark McGowan’s senior bureaucrat ‘slice-and-dice’ program swung into action.

There should be no crying in your beer over Barry. It is he who granted the Shire of York its Tavern Licence that may give York ratepayers a massive fiscal hangover for years to come, unless the current Shire Council finds an equitable solution.
Or others in authority do it for them, and quickly.

Numerous pundits believe the chances of the former is about the same as the AFL Grand Final being played at Forrest Oval between the Dockers and the Eagles.

In effect, what Sargeant did was pervert the course of justice under any and all laws of fair trading because there was no WA State statute to stop him, and as he so eloquently and arrogantly put it- ‘because I can’ even if it was an unconscionable act.

While the extremely grubby Shire of York, at that time, rubbed its hands together in pseudo-economic ecstasy as it drew up plans for financial failure for its Forrest Bare& Grilled and its sad, silent and empty convention centre.

No-one likes to hear of any persons’ career being pole-axed, but with Sargeant there is plenty of reasons for acrimony.

One of Barry’s better efforts was to accept a fully paid, luxury travel package to Macau from James Packer’s Crown Casino, Perth, because Packer was losing out in the high-roller Asian gambler stakes. Sargeant should have been sacked on the spot.

Instead Sargeant returned a multi-billionaires’ hero with Crown Perth, Australia’s most monopolistic gambling den’s, profits soaring by $76 million.

He then reduced the number of annoying Department of Liquor Licencing Inspectors patrolling Packer’s empire to the bare minimum.

At the same time his boss, Terry Waldron, in in his last days in office as Minister for Racing, Gaming and Liquor, gave Packer a 3 % tax concession.

Sargeant did York no favours and neither has the still incumbent, Director General of the Department of Local Government. (The words and Communities has been axed from the Ministers’ title.)

Jennifer Matthews, has had an uncomplimentary novel of complaints written about her exploits over the past nine years- that those now in power know about.

Maybe she should put her hair in a bun, just in case the axeman cometh.

David Taylor.


Friday, 28 April 2017

TO THE SHIRE OF YORK’S FORREST BAR & CAFE DREAM RECOVERY TEAM

Three relevant new Ministers have been contacted in the past 24- hours and two have already replied.
This may mean you will be called on to get your facts straight and get your acts together, sooner than later.

Date April 28, 2017

Hon David Templeman MLA
Minister for Local Government
7th Floor Dumas House
2 Havelock Street
WEST PERTH, WA 6005

Dear Minister

Your ref :- THE FUTURE OF THE SHIRE OF YORK’S FORREST BAR & CAFE

I have written to your colleagues, Paul Papalia, and, John Quigley, questioning the legalities and legitimacy of the Shire of York Tavern, the Forrest Bar & Café.

Minister Papalia, through his portfolios, may have some interest in the destructive affects this tavern has had on tourism and the facts of how, when and why the Department of Liquor Licencing issued this licence that has caused so much controversy in the local community- and damage to local businesses operating in the beverage and food marketplace.

I have suggested to the Attorney General that the Shire of York Tavern Licence 6020142381 is a business licence to trade commercially in direct competition with private businesses owned and operated by the Shire’s own ratepayers, much to their financial detriment.

Therefore its actions as a commercial enterprise could be scrutinized under the terms of Section 46, Competition and Consumer Act 2010, the Trade Practices Act, Fair Trading Laws and laws pertaining to continuing trading in Insolvency.

As the Shire of York’s Forrest Tavern, now renamed the Forrest Bar & Café, was initially funded by the National’s Royalties for Regions scheme I have written to the Local Member for the Central Wheatbelt, Mia Davies, the party’s new leader.

Ms. Davies had claimed in the media that’ Royalties for Regions was the most scrutinized spend in Government’.

She went on to say that every project required a business case to be prepared by the department responsible for the spend.

In this case it would appear that the past Department of Local Government and Communities would bear part of the responsibility for the initial spend.

The project was then assessed by the Department of Regional Development (suggesting that as a regional project, including the Tavern, it was cleared to proceed by this department) and then passed on to Cabinet for final approval.

I informed Ms. Davies that the aggregate spend on this capital works project, including the tavern, was now in excess of $15 Million or a current $5,000 debt for every man, woman and child in the Shire of York.

Obviously she has not replied.

Much of the annual debt is created by the expenditure on, and continuing financial failure of the Forrest Bar & Café.

The result has been a massive increase in Shire domestic and commercial rates to the point of being extremely deleterious to the socio-economic welfare of the community, including a massive, negative impact on its future.

Given the current circumstances the enormous scale of percentage increases of these rates could continue well into the next decade.

It is my information that no adequate or proper business case, including whole of life costings for this project, was designed and produced by the Shire of York, with the onus being on the Shire President, his Council, the Chief Executive Officer and his deputy, the Finance Officer and the Planning Officer to have done so.

Should the Attorney General initiate an investigation and the tavern found to be in breach of any business laws and regulations, then those at the Shire of York at that time, responsible for ideation, approval and development of this project should be held appropriately accountable.

The senior officers of the Department of Local Government and Communities, being responsible to ensure good governance and financial accountability could also share a degree of culpability, as well as the Director General of Liquor Licencing, the Department of Regional Development and the previous Cabinet.

The current Council that was elected in 2015, and the Senior Local Government official, the Chief Executive Officer appointed at the beginning of 2016, have been fully aware of this ongoing serious financial position which commenced four (4) years ago and have only  recently made any effort to try and alleviate the situation.

This was through public submissions, finally released at an Ordinary Meeting of Council , held on April 24, 2017, just four days ago.

Of the 12 submissions received only two made much sense. The first was to close the Café (Restaurant) and allow the sporting clubs to run their own bar under a leasing arrangement. The other was to lease the Forrest Bar & Café to a private business.

The argument here is who should be the Licencee? The answer should be not the Shire of York- and the Licence should not be a Tavern Licence.

The alternative action would be to place the Forrest Bar & Café into enforced receivership, bring in an independent liquidator to find an appropriate debt recovery solution. Personally I do not believe that the Shire of York as an entity has the capabilities to resolve this issue to the satisfaction of the majority of the community.

Obviously , if the Attorney General undertakes an investigation that provides evidence of serious wrongdoings under commercial laws then the possibility of finding a market for the Forrest Bar and Café could end- leading to its permanent closure.

Since 2008 many ratepayers in rural areas say that they suffered under at least one totally incompetent Minister for Local Government and Communities and his similarly incompetent department. The list of failures is substantial.

Having previously been a Minister for Local Government I am sure you are aware of the degree of disregard in which the Department of Local Government and Communities has been held, along with a number of Shire Councils.

I am hoping that you, as the new Minister, can assist in finding an acceptable solution for the issue of a Shire Council being allowed to own and run a business that seriously affects other local businesses and places its community  and ratepayers in serious jeopardy through financial harm.

Yours sincerely

David Taylor

Shire of York Ratepayer 

Wednesday, 26 April 2017

SHIRE OF YORK TAVERN LICENCE 60201422381 (Nowhere to run-Nowhere to hide) RECEIVERSHIP, LIQUIDATION & DISPOSAL OF DEBT.

Date April 27, 2017

Hon John Quigley MLA
Attorney General
10th Floor London House
216 St. Georges Terrace
PERTH WA 6005

Dear Attorney General

Re Attachment ‘Legalities of the Shire of York owned Tavern & Tavern Licence’.

I have written to Minister Papalia advising him of a Royalties for Regions funded, shire-owned Tavern in York that has currently cost ratepayers $15.8million and destroyed much of York’s tourism, hotel and restaurant structure over the past four years. The problem has direct links to his portfolios of Tourism and Racing, Gaming and Liquor.

The wastage of state revenue on Royalties for Regions funding is massive, but in Local Government Area terms much has been spent on not-for-profit community projects such as basketball courts, skate parks and swimming pools.

Although attached to the local sporting complex, this Tavern could be argued to be a failed commercial business enterprise not a community asset and therefore subject to State and Federal business laws.

Through pressure from the local community the Shire of York has finally approached its ratepayers to provide submissions on how, and by whom, the Forrest Tavern, now rebadged as the Forrest Bar & Cafe should be run.
Given the Shires past performance there is really nowhere to run and nowhere to hide
The current owner of the tavern premises is the Shire of York, the holder of the current Tavern Licence 6020142381 is the Shire of York. That is a cold, hard fact.

All breaches of ownership and operation of commercial premises under the Trade Practices Act, Fair Trading Laws, Australian Competition Laws, Australian Small business Laws, Australian Insolvency Laws and WA Liquor Licencing Laws should be the responsibility of the Shire of York regarding its tavern and its performance.

Any fines payable for trading insolvency over a four-year period, other breaches of commercial regulations, any compensation claims by similar local businesses primarily forced into liquidation by competition from this tavern and the massive local rates increases caused by its insolvency-is the legal and equitable responsibility of the Shire of York.

Should the Shire of York be found accountable for any breaches of any laws relating to its ownership and operation of its Tavern Licence, then its ratepayers should be absolved from paying rates associated with all costs of the Tavern’s business operations and any fines and compensation payments.

Although renamed the Forrest Bar & Café these premises are still owned and operated under Shire of York Tavern Licence 6020142381 and should be operated under the terms and conditions of a ‘Tavern Licence’ including opening hours and the service of substantial meals at the required times. This does not occur.

I believe that prior to the 2008 State Election, you had some concerns regarding the laws of governance and accountability covering Local Government Areas in Western Australia. If this is the case, the past eight years have proved your concerns to be well founded.

I believe it is unconscionable for a Local Government Area to own and operate a commercial business in direct competition with its own ratepayers.

I am hoping that you feel it necessary for your legal team to address and then redress this blight in a democracy that embraces fair trading, fair dealing and fair competition without interference through government ownership.

The solution may well be to ensure that the Forrest Bar & Café is placed in receivership and a liquidator placed in control to provide the best options regarding the Tavern Licence, its disposal and the accrued substantial debt relief.

I hope to have a response from you regarding this matter at your convenience.

Yours sincerely

David Taylor

Shire of York Ratepayer.



Tuesday, 25 April 2017

SHOULD THE FORREST BAR GO BEFORE THE BAR-

                                                       BARROOM GOSSIP QUESTIONAIRE

Dear David, Paul and Susie.

When you guys are talking  among yourselves you may like to answer a few questions that have been already asked
regarding the Tavern, Fair Trading, Insolvency and compliance with Tavern Liquor Licencing Trading Laws.

You registered your Tavern, under the Shire of York, with the Department of Liquor Licencing. This would or should be a business trading name as a Tavern is a commercial business, not just a not for profit community facility.

The Shire of York Tavern Licence 6020142381, Shire of York Forrest Oval Complex, Barker St. York has been known to be the Forrest Tavern and now the Forrest Bar and Café. So have either of theses names ever been registered with Liquor Licencing and do you have a specified licensee? If not, is there a legitimate reason for this?

Was there any particular reason it was not registered to the council offices being 1 Joaquina Street, York WA 6302 in the first place, being the official address of the tavern owner?
Technically, as Shire of York Tavern Licence 6020142381 owner, you have been using ratepayers money to fund  a business that has been seriously insolvent for the past 4 years.

Does this raise any questions regarding your liabilities, if any?

These are just questions- however do you have the right legally correct answers?

Kind regards
David Taylor





The following questions have been raised with authorities regarding the legal status of the Forrest Tavern/ Bar & Cafe.

1. Although owned and controlled by a Local Government Shire has its operations been in breach of the Trade Practices Act and, Fair Trading Laws?

2. is it registered as a company under the Liquor Control Act 1988 and, if so, should it be investigated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission under Australian Insolvency Law?

3. Has it been in continuous breach of the terms and conditions of trade required by a Tavern Licence under
WA Liquor Licencing Regulations?

  

Dated April 26

Hon Paul Papalia
Minister for Racing, Gaming & Liquor
and Tourism
10th Floor Dumas House
2 Havelock Street
WEST PERTH, WA 6005

Dear Minister,

Your Ref: -                   

                                      LOCAL SHIRE OWNED TAVERN AT YORK
                                                                     
                                                                      versus
                       
          COMMONWEALTH TRADE PRACTICES ACT & FAIR TRADING LAWS
  
I wish you the best in covering your responsibilities as both the Minister for Tourism and Racing, Gaming and Liquor. Each of these portfolios is extremely important to the state’s economy and future.

The industry synergies are obvious along with both the positive and potentially negative impact they could have on each other in certain circumstances.

In April 2013, I lodged a complaint with the then new Minister for Local Government, Tony Simpson, and the WA Department of Liquor Licencing (DLL) regarding the potential negatives of a Local Government Area Shire being granted a ‘Tavern’ Liquor Licence.

I believed it could cause serious financial damage to privately owned taverns, hotels and ancillary license holders such as several restaurants and or cafes in a small, rural town such as York.

I raised the issue that hell-would-freeze-over before local liquor licence holders in the City of Nedlands would allow the Council to open a competitive tavern in that city.

The clear moral and ethical issues were ‘Competive Neutralities’ and ‘Conflicts of Interest’ with a shire using municipal funds to fully and unfairly compete against established local liquor-licenced outlets.

The potential consequences were beyond belief and unfortunately have come true, causing chaos in the liquor, restaurant, accommodation and the tourism industry as a whole in one of Australia’s most historic, iconic towns.

The catalyst for this disaster was a Royalties for Regions grant allied to the commercial stupidity of the Shire of York Council and its senior Public Service Officers that has led to $15.8 million financial fiasco.


This letter was written and sent straight after the 2013 WA State Election: 

WELCOME TO YOUR LOCAL NATIONALS SHIRE OF YORK TAVERN


Dear Sir-

As the Nationals come to grips with no longer being roosters in the parliamentary henhouse on the hill, the WA Government is still attempting to solve the accelerating problem of binge drinking and alcohol fueled violence.

It is with no thanks to its former balance of power-broking partner who managed to get an unrestricted Tavern Licence for a Shire in the Central Wheatbelt Electorate, just prior to the last State Election.

Skeptics could say this was the Nationals ‘Royalties for Regions’ finest hour of pork barreling.

The lucky lotto winner was the Shire of York. The licence issued to an edifice, the York Convention and Recreation Centre, part funded by the Royalties for Regions scheme in Brendon Grills’ former electorate.

It would have had the stamp of approval of Nationals MP, Terry Waldron, and Minister for Racing, Gaming and Liquor.

In its application the Shire of York requested the right to open its Tavern bar for up to, a staggering, 94 hours per week so there is an obvious alcohol sale, profit motivated, and liquor licence ownership conundrum here.

The Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor’s (RGL) excuse is it supports local governments shaping the way liquor is sold and supplied in their communities

But this should not mean Shires own the ‘watering hole’ down the road.  Shire Councils have absolutely no certified expertise in any matter pertaining directly to the effects of the distribution, sale and consumption of alcohol or being an appropriate licensee.

The RGL states In accordance with sections 39 and 40 of the Liquor Control Act 1988 an applicant for a (Liquor) licence must submit Local Government Certificates demonstrating compliance with a number of Acts, mainly concerning the Local Government Act 1995, any other law relating to sewerage and drainage and specific town planning scheme matters.

This is hardly an endorsement of the ability of a Shire to own a Tavern and be allowed to profit from selling alcohol and food to the financial detriment of local business owners.

However it does allow for a Shire Council to be its own judge and jury in much of the application process for its own licence.

This was a lucky break for the Shire of York as its imbecilic application approval process took 15 months because it could not properly define what ‘in-the-community- interest’ means.

It is hardly surprising there were some ‘community interest’ difficulties.

This small rural town already had a combined total of one hotel and two taverns, (as well as a number of licenced cafes) and two Liquor sales outlets with some forced to trade at reduced hours because of lack of customers. One hotel had already closed.

What is missing now is community sporting club licences specifically geared to meet the needs of members and the local sporting community to assist in their fund raising.

It also raises the issue of how the third tier of Australian Government is allowed to compete directly against private enterprise by being granted the commercial licence to do so by a fellow government agency.

Nobody begrudges sporting teams having a relaxing tipple in their own bar, in their Shire owned sports and recreation center complex under an appropriate sporting venue liquor licence held by the sporting clubs.

 An Unrestricted Tavern Licence granted to the Shire itself is a local government- profit motivated -overkill.

The response from the Director General of Liquor Licencing, Barry Sargeant, via his department, is there is no legal impediment to him granting a Tavern Licence to a local government shire.  I am assuming he means under The Liquor Licencing Act, 1988

In fact the only reason the Shire of York obtained this licence, after failing miserably to meet the application criteria is that the DLL, at the eleventh hour, basically wrote the application for it. 
Also through Barry Sargeant, the Minister, Terry Waldron, demanded that the application be approved.

In its first application the Shire of York specifically requested a Tavern Licence. When the application was resubmitted it was for an unspecified ‘Liquor Licence’- that actually does not exist. Liquor Licences are made up of a number of specific licences with specified functions

The Department of Liquor Licencing assisted newly found ‘in the community interest’ version was some 13 months after the original Shire version.

When asked why the change in the application from ‘Tavern Licence’ to the innocuous, unspecified, therefore non –existent ‘Liquor Licence’ Sargeant’s response  is that all interested respondents would have remembered that the original request was for a Tavern Licence.

Sargeant also said the Shire of York had a proven record of good governance and financial accountability so it was an ideal applicant for a Tavern Licence.

ORIGINAL LETTER ENDS


Both these responses could have been proven as false and misleading. In particular this shire was already being questioned on its lack of good governance and financial practices including withholding the required disclosure of exorbitant corporate credit card use.

The current situation regarding the Shire and its Forrest Tavern, recently rebadged as the Forrest Bar and Café is perfectly well explained in the local social media website’ The Real Voice of York’  that can be easily accessed through “Google’ by your staff.

The 2017 Shire of York Council appears to be little better than the 2013 version, particularly with regard to Tavern Licence ownership, although now having requested community submissions regarding its future.

What should have occurred at least twelve months ago was a local plebiscite to be distributed to all adult members of the community asking a very simple question- ‘Should the Shire of York be the licencee of the Forrest Tavern- YES or NO- tick the box.

The submissions would have been automatically simplified by the result of the plebiscite. 

The Forrest Tavern, now Forrest  Bar and Café has rarely met licencing regulations on opening hours, provided substantial meals when required to do so at certain opening times and has held many café-style ‘Coffee & Cake events  in direct competition with several local cafes  who hold no form of liquor licence.

This was a deliberate attempt to create a new income stream to the detriment of non-competitive businesses as the financial viability of the Tavern collapsed.


The question is has the Shire of York, using public money in its own commercial interest been in breach of The Trade Practices Act and or Fair Trading Laws including has its Tavern been trading while insolvent.

As the new Minister in both portfolios covering this problem, it is a position that requires a legal answer, possibly with the assistance of the Attorney General, John Quigley?

Yours sincerely

David Taylor.

Thursday, 20 April 2017

TO THE VERY LAST CHANCE SALOON

The Forrest Bankruptcy Bar & Cashless Café- the time for cheap shots is over- let’s have some expensive ones.

The world’s best restaurant for 2017 is the many Michelin starred ‘Eleven Madison Park, New York, USA’, featuring nouveau Euro- American creations where the lucky diners lick their plates clean.

The world’s most expensive restaurant for the next 50 years is the Forrest Bar & Café, York, WA, featuring good old-fashioned, homeless-style cuisine for which all unlucky ratepayers get their wallets cleaned out.

Three of the co-owners of this fine diner may find they pay the ultimate fine by losing their seats at the next Local Government Election and the new state government is starting to hunt down Senior Local Government Officers who go missing in action by ensconcing themselves in another, usually country shire, after being crème-d by the WACCC.

As is not uncommon within local government ranks in this day and age, the replacement CEO at Mukinbudin, Dirk Sellenger, although probably not involved with the WACCC, left his former shire of Mount Marshall under a cyclone.

On his grumpy ‘Emoji’ Facebook page Mr Sellenger describes others as “low life pieces of shit”.
It is assumed he is referring to the Shire of Mount Marshall councillors or former colleagues.

The Shire of York may find itself being a governmental main course, even with some DLGC eliminations- just like on My Kitchen Rules.

Another unfortunate sign of the times is the opening page of the Shire of York’s new website “Welcome Shire of York”. There are two potential explanations for this. One could be that the shire is being welcomed somewhere else or it could not afford the additional cost for “The”.

The very first screen link on the website is “Pay Online” that could explain everything!



                                                      THE VERY LAST DROP CAFE
                                                                Limited Menu
                                                       Opening hours- whenever
ENTRÉE

Asset Oysters (number unknown)                                                                       not available
Pay-packet Garlic Bread (40 pieces or more)                                                     $2. Million
Nouveau ideas Soufflé                                                                                           not available
Convention Centre Crap cakes                                                                              $8. Million
Last Drop Salary Salad                                                                                            (F.O.I)
MAINS

Special Ratepayer Ragout                                                                                       $5 Million
Government Grants with mushroom gravy train                                               not available
Financial Year Fettuccini with our new truffle truth syrup                                (F.O.I )
Cash Stake with financial source                                                                            (F.O.I/ maybe $3 million)


OUR SPECIAL GIBSON DESERTS

Convent Crumble Pie                                                                                               $1 Million                            
Local Rocky-Road  Mix                                                                                             $1 million-per annum)
Liquor Licence Liqueur                                                                                             (F.O.1)


(Prices can be dramatically changed without notice.) (Excludes GST on $15.2 Million.) 

GRATUITIES & TIPS.

The tip is for the Shire of York to get out of the pub game now as rules may change.

Remember a Bar & Café by any other name is a Tavern, the Licence for which you should never have been granted and there could be serious legal ramifications down the line. (That is unless you have changed the Licence? Otherwise if it quacks it is a f…king duck.)

This Licence ended up as being a vote grabbing political gift from former Minister, Terry Waldron, around the time of the 2013 State Election and the new government knows that.

One thing that could happen is the revisiting of the Liquor Control Act 1988 that is thirty years out of date and exactly what your obligations really are regarding local government ownership of a Tavern Licence without even going into aspects such as Competitive Neutrality.

It comes down to what privately owned taverns must provide to their customers without being in breach of their Licence, compared to what the Shire of York provides, not what makes $200,000 per annum.

Maybe you should make some enquiries with the new Minister for Liquor & Gaming, Paul Papalia? Others certainly will.

He is also the new Minister for Tourism and the question will be asked what financial damage has the Forrest Bar & Café (Tavern) had on tourism related businesses in York. You can count on that.

These questions are not rhetorical, and I expect an answer to this, to me, by no later than 5pm (WST) April 27, 2017.

David Taylor.

Thursday, 13 April 2017

RAY’S GONE- BUT THE MEMORY LINGERS ON.

Hon David Templeman
Dear David

It would appear that Mukinbudin has dispensed with Ray Hooper’s services. His replacement is full-time CEO, Dirk Sellenger.

I have yet to check where Mr. Hooper is, but given the performance of WALGA it is likely he will be recommended to, then foisted on, some poor, unsuspecting rural town.

There is no statute of limitations regarding malfeasance with the illicit spending of public monies. Mr Hooper was never found ‘not guilty’ of any act and may well still have a case to answer.

Your own staff has found that senior public service offices have managed to remain well and truly ensconced in a highly paid industry leaving in suspicious circumstances from one shire council to reappear at another.

In Ray Hooper’s case his credit card, rental assistance and other salary packaging meant that he earned around the Australian minimum wage above and beyond his exorbitant six-figure salary.

I am sure you agree that the near criminal, immoral largesse of some councils cannot continue and examples have to be made to stop ratepayers being ripped off.

One action is to let it be known within the industry that Ray Hooper is now personae- non-grata
and should hold no future position in local government.

Regarding the issue of the recalcitrant Mayor of Perth, Ms. Lisa Scaffidi, the Premier may have difficulty in removing her from office as a single entity.

Under the Local Government Act 1995 I believe you personally have the power to suspend and/or sack the entire City of Perth Council.

Kind regards
David Taylor.



Date April 14, 2017

Hon David Templeman MLA
Minister for Local government
7th Floor Dumas House
WEST PERTH WA 6085

Your Ref : - ‘RATEPAYERS FUNDED COUNCILS’ TWO YEAR BOOZE BINGE.
                       Relating to FORMER SHIRE OF YORK CEO, RAY HOOPER.


Much of this was written months ago before the State Election. You may have received it before titled WALGA’S RAY OF SUNSHINE.

You would have now read the article in ‘Perth Now’ called ” Ratepayers Funded Councils two Year Booze Binge”  regarding the Exmouth Councils ability to spend $30,000 in two years on alcohol.

They, as a group, could be called quite prudent as former Shire of York CEO Ray Hooper, between 2004 and 2014, managed to spend approximately $25,000 a year on booze, restaurants, accommodation travel and trinkets.  This $250,000 was spent mainly on him, but on odd occasions it included council cronies and his wife.

Hooper resigned in April 2014 as allegations of massive misuse of his credit card emerged.  Fake investigations were conducted by fellow council employees and he was technically cleared of any wrong doing by the then Shire of York Commissioner, James Best.

The investigation could at best (no pun intended) be called a farce.

The Perth Now article exposed the fact that many of these miscreants end up in highly paid employment in other country shire councils.

 Ray Hooper is now the Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Shire of Mukinbudin.

As I think you are aware-many in York have been loud and clear in condemnation of  the former State and Local Government bureaucracy in its inability to engage with local communities to establish what their wants and needs really are.

Also regarding the continuing regime of Local Government, senior employees with no abilities and ethics who are repeatedly reincarnated by inglorious bastard, finger-in-the-pie groups- such as WALGA.

Rural shires especially are strictly limited to the wants and needs of WALGA’s often incompetent Membership Board. So it is time for your government to make important socio-economic and administrative changes.

Letter sent to Lynne Craigie, President WALGA, September 14, 2016.
Your Ref: - Acting CEO Ray Hooper.
Congratulations

It appears that WALGA in an ersatz Local Government Mafiosi encouraging and perpetuating the lowest standards of officialdom within Local Government Areas, while retaining the highest level of poor quality administration and lack of ethics and morality among your members.

As you can see both Tony Simpson and the Premier have been in the past, and now in the present, made aware of local government community disrespect of the likes of Ray Hooper and by association, WALGA.

Letter sent to Tony Simpson and Colin Barnett, September 11, 2016
Your ref: - RAY HOOPER former CEO- SHIRE OF YORK

The disgraced former CEO of the Shire of York, Ray Hooper, has resurrected himself as Acting CEO of the Mukinbudin Shire.

Two years ago it was reported in the press that Hooper had resigned amid accusations of misuse of a corporate credit card, using improper auditing procedures and engaging in the personal harassment of local ratepayers.

It has been alleged that Hooper left York with a multi-billion dollar debt including a new $15.2 million convention and recreation centre and Shire-owned tavern in extreme financial difficulty and crumbling assets such as unmaintained and unsafe local roads.

Hooper’s activities were brought to the attention of the Major Fraud Squad and the CCC, but no charges have been laid (nor has he ever been officially exonerated.)

Hooper’s appointment has come at a time when the Auditor General, Colin Murphy, has continuously expressed grave concerns regarding the quality of the financial auditing of nearly 50 per cent of Local Governments in WA and questions have been asked regarding the capabilities of the Minister for Local Government and his department.

 You would be aware that Minister Tony Simpson later sacked himself.

                                                                  Ray’s resurrection!

The only living creature that can survive a nuclear holocaust is believed to be the humble cockroach.

However there is another great survivor, a humble Local Government love-child named Ray Hooper.

Now this brilliant example of local government administration aficionados’ is the Acting CEO of the Shire of Mukinbudin.

How lucky are the 491 locals who can look forward to his friendly smile, his personal generosity with
the Shire’s Corporate Credit Card and getting a postcard when he attends an obscure conference in some Far-North Queensland holiday resort at their expense.

The Mukinbudin Council must have seen Ray’s enthusiastic referee statements from Kalgoorlie, Chittering and last, but not least, York. Then there are all the glowing testimonials in the Fitz-Gerald Report.

I am sure the Mukinbudin’s are mightily impressed with the lovely article which appeared in The West Australian after York’s much-loved leader resigned suddenly leaving the town physically, emotionally- and financially devastated.

Yes Mukinbudin now feels like it has just won ‘Lotto’.

So ring them up and ask to say ‘Gooday Ray’ or drop him a friendly email wishing him well.
The number is 9047 2100 and the email is admin@mukinbudin.wa.gov.au .

He is not wanted by the Major Fraud Squad or the Corruption and Crime Commission. So make him feel wanted by somebody!

Maybe it is time for Labor’s Department of Local Government to make Mr. Hooper feel unwelcome
everywhere.

Kind regards

David Taylor.


  

Monday, 10 April 2017

YORK'S IN THE MONEY (Perhaps)

Regarding yesterday’s epistle to Mia Davies aptly called WHAT A CROCK!
It was about her interview, in The West Australian, on the business plans for the use of Royalties for Regions. Her statement that these uses had the approval of the appropriate department and herself, as a former Member of Cabinet, is astounding.

She has her own copy of “What a Crock “and so do a lot of other politicians.

Personally I have no animosity towards Ms. Davies and I hope she understands that. However, I have no respect for what she has achieved in the past which could be best defined as the ‘small stuff” while the trouble she caused was known as the “big stuff”.

As Minister for Water and Forests she was loathed by many who worked in these departments, creating a great deal of animosity with the experts who thought she was an interfering, unintellectual “Barbie Doll”.


They showed what they thought of her in the best way possible- they resigned.

She obviously has a few friends in the central Wheatbelt for whatever reason and is back as the Member for Central Utopia, also called La La Land. But she no longer has Brendon Grylls to watch her back!

It is probably that, unfortunately, the Central Wheatbelt has become such a basket case over the past eight years no other candidate really wanted to try and pick up the pieces.

The far more important news for York is that Premier Mark McGowan has committed himself, and $450 million, to destination tourism. York should make itself high on the list of these destinations

Alannah McTiernan, the new Minister for Regional Development has, a different mindset regarding much of the use of Royalty for Regions.

Painting swimming pools and planting petunias in the main street are out.

The new in is the forward- thinking infrastructure development of agricultural regions like the Wheatbelt including energy/ utility projects and much needed research.

So the future may be less rosy and more filled with capital works and other projects for the State’s most necessary granary.

Those I do have a deep and abiding loathing for and animosity against are some “Anonymous” pinheads who comment.

However, they have every right to show that they have no credibility, are nondescript, faceless and colourless and basically gutless. That is pretty much the lexicons’ (dictionary if you do not know) description of what an Anon-my-Arse is.

Ah yes- there is a difference between to and too. I am glad that Anonymous of April 9 pointed this out- and yes I certainly do know where York is. I think I no (sorry know) you. You are the two-headed Dumbo that loves wearing your tutu to much- or is it too much.

Dr. James Plumridge has my respect because he has the strength of character to use his name and express himself how he feels-using it. No-one really wants to hear from those who are not strong or proud enough of themselves to use their own name.

Regards
David Taylor.

Sunday, 9 April 2017

WHAT A CROCK!

April 10, 2017
Hon Mia Davies
Member for Central Wheatbelt
The Old Town Hall
Mitchell Street
MERREDIN WA 6415

Dear Ms. Davies,

Your Ref : - The West Australian  “Royalties for Regions to get major shake- up”. April 10, 2017.

It is great to read about your in in-depth knowledge of the effects of the Royalty for Regions program as delivered by you and the now defunct Brendon Grylls.

Certainly it must be exciting to still be the Member for the planet Central Utopia where lies become truth and financial suicide becomes brilliant commercial decisions. Then of course you’re feeling that you well may be Ivana Trump’s doppelganger. (She’s Trump’s first wife.)

Please let me ensure that those few erudite words you delivered to the press actually came from you, are correct, and taken in context?

The first is that the new Labor Government is ‘slashing (the Royalties for Regions program’ for projects ‘that should be funded out of general revenue.’

Maybe you were getting a facial when the news broke that because of your government’s financial gambles and fiscal failings, WA is in its worst economic state sinceThe Great Depression”.

The Iron Ore Boom ended in 2014, three years ago and general revenue plunged then. I hope it did not interfere with your pedicure appointments so you missed the Cabinet  discussions about being broke?!


So what ‘Monopoly Money’ general revenue are you talking about, the $1 billion black hole, or the $43 billion deficit you left behind?

Now here is another of your significant quotes ‘Royalties for Regions was the most scrutinized spend in Government’.

Now who were the scrutineers? One was certainly the Western Australian Corruption and Crime Commission and the Auditor General, Colin Murphy, was another- trying to get his mind around a $6 billion squander.

And of course there was Brendon Grylls massive Royalties for Regions property spend in the Pilbara that has collapsed. Now the Australian Securities and Investment Commission are after the rapacious rogue Real Estate Agent, Veronica MacPherson who Grylls’ both covertly and overtly promoted her project in the region.

Former Premier Colin Barnett was sick and tired of R4R, claiming all the cherries had been picked, or was it just the low hanging fruit?

Now here comes the classic of all time that makes everyone believe you may have snorted too much Canola.

It is assumed that the following drivel includes such magnificent community ventures and much used local recreation facilities as the York Recreation and Convention Centre (YRCC) and the South Hedland Aquatic Park (SHAP) that has not been used for two summers?

Now for your Hans Christian Anderson quote of the 21st Century

Every project required a business case to be prepared by the department responsible for the spend, assessed by the Department of Regional Development and assessed by Cabinet for approval.

Currently the Shire of York in your Electoral Planet of Central Utopia has an internal income shortfall of $2.2 million this financial year in rates and sundry debts. This will more likely get much worse, not better.

Your Central Utopia has the second highest unemployment rate in WA of nearly 8 %, but probably as high as 18% in some of the really utopian parts.

The YRCC, with much of its concept still being defended vigorously by the Shire, has caused an overall debit of $15.2 million, to service 300, but with repayments made by an entire population which has, as a couple of non-generous and generous guesses of between 2,900 to 3,400 people.

So where is the business case- by what department- and when did you give your approval. Or did you have to leave Cabinet early for you hair appointment with Maurice Meade?

No matter what- it will cost everyone in York, ratepayer or two-year-old toddler, $5,000 each to pay off the debt as it stands today with a diminishing, mainly poorly paid population to pay for it- who are just living the dream.

This does not include future maintenance; restoration and payment of loan interest and possible future capital investment that could see the debt grow to $30 million by 2035.

Effectively, there are no changes that can be made that will make it much less than a millennial millstone caused by Royalty for Regions.

So when you sit with your feet up in your Electorate Office, giving yourself a manicure, think back about what Barnett said about low hanging fruit.

Or did he actually mean Lemon, being the R4R and you?

Kinds Regards

David Taylor.(Call me anytime- I am sure Max Trenorden sends his regards).

Thursday, 6 April 2017

PARADISE LOST (maybe York to?)

Three-hundred and fifty years ago a blind man was far more insightful than the sighted. Not only did he write one of the greatest of poems, he fought for free speech and freedom of the press though he could have been executed for expressing these thoughts.

His name was John Milton, a venerated forefather of what is now social media, the right of the common man and woman to publically debunk elitism, political lies, the abuse of power, the tyranny of aristocracy and the forced showing of undue respect to those who deserve none. All accomplished by the power of the pen- and now computer.

Milton considered Oliver Cromwell, who assisted in executing King Charles 1 as a hero of liberty and equality. Milton was certainly not a Royalist, just like Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull today.

In the 1950’s the Wheatbelt was also Paradise. Beautiful, long family trips down dusty memory lanes, lined with lazily hanging eucalypts, for a pit stop with home-made biscuits and tea hot from the thermos.

Waving in harmony with the whispering gentle breeze would be a wheat crop stretching endlessly across the landscape.

This scene was not lonely but tranquil. A view of a broad church with blue skies, a sprinkling of fluffy, cotton-wool clouds and fields of gold that was a place for quiet reflection, peace and contentment.

Nothing has really changed that much in the allure of the bush other than the shade from some aesthetically graceful trees are now but a bitter wood-chip memory. Also many of the roads are no longer graded gravel- they are crumbling bitumen lined with potholes.

But is it still paradise? The rural countryside itself is!

However what of the people?

Men wore hats when they came to York and doffed them with respect to ladies in brightly coloured floral dresses. The police Sergeant had automatic respect, the Postmaster, the Stationmaster, the head of the Roads Board, the Country Party Member, the Shire President, the School Headmaster and the local priest and pastor- even if they were all absolute tools.

Now personal, political and public service respect is a memory, investigated and sometimes rightfully destroyed by social media, for others than for those who can actually prove they deserve some. Respect has to be earned the hard way these days.

There is more ‘ICE’ in the Wheatbelt than the South Pole, and it is destroying young adults, leaving them psychotic and dangerous, and sometimes dead. So do the police deserve respect for this inability to control a deadly scourge?

And has any past Government Department bothered to tell you that Yongah Hills Detention Centre in Northam is no longer a refugee camp? It should be known as a high security prison filled with mainly vicious New Zealand Bikie Gang Members, like ‘The Mongrel Mob’ waiting to be deported. (It will more than likely become a holiday camp for Christian Tarou Chadwick on his way home.)

It has the occasional savage bashing of innocent people to prevent these arseholes from getting bored. Yet some of the guards are still the ones who were trained to look after women and children from Muslim countries and their lives are being put at risk by Serco.

Any employee who dares to tell the public there are vicious bikies in the Yongah Hills woodpile will get sacked by the company in a split second.

Then there is the Shire of York and its council so different in structure, delivery and demands from five to six decades ago.

Does it deserve automatic respect because many have been taught to revere authority and not to question its supposed Local Government God-given right of dominant control and often hidden, personal agendas?  That is the individuals call.

Should it be treated with disrespect or distain? That is also up to the individual.

However the best way to treat the Shire of York is let the ugly financial reality be publically known, not hidden by creative accounting and deathly silence.

Currently the Shire has an internal income shortfall of $2.2 million this financial year in rates and sundry debts. This will more likely get much worse, not better.

Many thousands of workers who came to WA for the mining boom have returned home so the State’s portion of the GST will get even smaller and it is claimed to be an additional $1 billion ‘black hole’ in the WA economy.

Assertions are already being made that the WA economy is in its worst financial state since the ‘Great Depression’.

Money allocated for both Commonwealth and State grant funding will be scarce and what little there is will be granted only to the best and most needy funding requests.

The Shire of York better be good at holding out the begging bowl, there are likely to be 20 less government and semi-government agencies to plead with and 20% less local government executives to crawl to.

It better start thinking laterally. This is something that public servants are not trained to do. 

The Shire should have a legal axe to grind with Commissioner James Best, because he was never hired by anyone for his farcical Chrystal ball gazing called ‘Visioning’.

Best, as Commissioner, was all powerful. No Acting CEO could hire him such as Graeme Simpson. He was employed and introduced to York by Brad Jolly because Tony Simpson could not walk, talk, breathe and make decisions all at the same time.

The Shire Council was suspended so it had no power to hire anybody for anything. The only one with the power to hire the Commissioner for York & Visioning and (the fraudulent excessive-price purchase of a property) was the Minister Tony Brad Simpson-Jolly who claims he did not.

So the Shire should collectively grow some cojones and demand our money back- or put Best’s head on a platter. Simpson has already been dispatched back to his bakery and Brad Jolly is part of nasty allegations of passed incompetence in the Lisa Scaffidi affair.

York probably does not know how big its population is and what real volumes of utilities such as water, electricity and gas it actually has to play with in the future to attract development. It also might be short 200 or 300 ratepayers already- if REIWA is right?

Does the Shire know if Western Power has, or could provide cheaply the Headworks for enough ‘three-phase’ electrical capacity for half-a-dozen new power hungry industries?

How many additional kilojoules of natural gas could it guarantee if it started negotiating with a major new enterprise for York? And at what would be the competitive price it could assist in establishing?

Around ten years ago the Shire of York did not know how much access water supply it had to provide to a Halal abattoir that was to be established.

What it did not have would cost $3 to $9million to deliver and the project sank like a stone.

These days any new comers are not investing in a business, but buying a property as a stairway to heaven.

The trains are long gone, there is one, each-way bus to Perth and no buses to Northam and no taxi. Tourist buses are now non-existent.

For these few new arrivals (if any), it is a case of watching the grass grow and the paint peeling off the facades in the main street. And look for a plot with a nice view as your final resting place.

York has the second highest unemployment rate in WA of nearly 8 %, the average age of the community is the second highest in the state, its average household income is one of the lowest and its rates, by comparison are astronomical.

The YRCC, with much of its concept still being defended vigorously by the Shire, has caused an overall debit of $15.2 million, to service 300, but with repayments made by an entire population which has, as a couple of non-generous and generous guesses of between 2,900 to 3,400 people.

In Port Hedland they have spent $35 million on community facilities such as basketball courts and a water playground for a population that is currently around 17,000 but was estimated to reach 50,000, by including reasonably close communities and the continuance of the mining boom. That did not and will not happen.

Paul Martin has been CEO of Port Hedland and now York. So you could ask him who he thought was the bigger bunch of economic idiots.

The question is it the council that spent $15 million including a small donation from Royalties for Regions on 3,000 people for the YRCC?

Or is it the council, with some R4R help, that spent $35 million on 17,000?

It is all a matter of calculating proportional, population, economic lunacy

The Port Hedland developments occurred around 2010-2012, when Paul was
CEO.

The Real Yell about the YRCC of York’ has certainly got its point across.
Probably no matter what- it will cost everyone in York, ratepayer or two-year-old toddler, $5,000 each to pay off the debt as it stands today with a diminishing, mainly poorly paid population to pay for it.

This does not including future maintenance; restoration and payment of loan interest and possible future capital investment that could see the debt grow to $30 million by 2035.

Effectively, there are no changes that can be made that will make it much less than a millennial millstone. I think everyone has indigested that!

Maybe Kasey Chambers or Lee Kernaghan can be convinced to do a gig at the Convention Centre. After all costs are taken out including ‘security’ you may lucky enough to gross $10,000 per concert. That should cover all up YRCC costs for 10 days.

It is touted that competitive neutrality begins when a local government business has an annual income above $200,000. What commercial businesses are LGA’s allowed to provide in competition with the private sector to anywhere near that income level, whether gross or net?

I believe the response from any potential entrepreneur to the Shire in this instance should be read the affidavit, GFY, and then see you in court.

Currently the costs of running the YRCC centre is annually miniscule compared to the amount required to be spent to bring York back to life. York has no financial capacity other than to face at least a five-year, dirt poor, annus horribilus and Paul Martin knows it.

The way that the Shire of York is currently economically structured, if the population fell to 2,000, everyone will be paying a minimum domestic household rate of $3,500 to $4,000 per property that is valued at an average of $250,000, with a rental payment average per week of $200 and around $450 if you have a mortgage.

That is just to keep the debt payments below $2 million per annum each year.

You can toss the financial fairness of estimated Gross Rental Value and Undeveloped Land Value, in York, in the bin with your totally overdrawn credit  card. And the Shire better not raise rate valuations this coming Financial Year one iota!

Just to keep a rusting roof over your head will add up to minimum outgoings of between $500 and $750 for many, prior to water, gas and electricity rates being paid and then finding the money to buy  something so the kids can eat.

Then there is the mooted $200 per annum increases in electricity prices and an investigation into Brendon Grylls’ Royalties for Regions Fuel Credit Card system.


In the end York will be totally reliant on its Shire Public Service Executives to keep the pack of wolves from the door.

Ms. Suzie Haslehurst is an interesting case regarding her employment. For 11 years she was the CEO of ‘Magabala Books Aboriginal Corporation’ until 2012, she was also engaged at a high level with the ‘Arts’. This all deserves great praise but there are no direct links with Local Government administration here.

However she did shift to the Shire of Broome to become Manager of Community Development joining the Acting CEO of Broome, Paul Martin in 2013 then again in York in 2016.

It appears that arts and culture and related events are going to be high on her agenda to save York.


Firstly York’s proposed Motorcycle Festival is a huge biannual event in Northam, 40 kilometres down the road. It has been for many years. Whether they dumped it because it was a waste of time and money, York is going to find out.

If it is to be operas like ‘Tosca’ and ‘La Traviata’ at the York Town Hall that could well be an underwhelming success.

Proposals such as bringing the WA Museums collection of farming artefacts and memorabilia to be displayed in York for the next four years has fallen on deaf ears.

York’s Involvement in the development of the ‘drone’ industry to assist in broad acre farming problems was placed in an Avon Waste bin. It is now too late as others are doing it.

Lighting up York on long weekends as a magical fantasy land with both children’s, historic and Avant Garde projections blazoned on buildings, streetscapes and the Avon River appear to have been rejected by the Shire of York’s ‘flat-earth’ committee.

Nearly five years after writing Paradise Lost, Milton wrote ‘Paradise Regained’.
It is up to the Shire of York Council to see if it has the ability to regain paradise.

The pressure is certainly on and the current truth hurts.


David Taylor